Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Ukraine-Russia: Germany takes steps to halt Nord Stream 2 [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(105,933 posts)26. They're right:
Facing strong opposition, Nord Stream 2 has run into numerous obstacles that have delayed but
not stopped its construction. The start of the project goes back to 2011, just after the first Nord
Stream pipeline was inaugurated, when Gazprom and a group of major European energy companies
decided to look into the possibility of doubling the capacity of the new undersea route. In 2015,
Gazprom and five EU companies Royal Dutch Shell, E.ON (subsequently replaced by Uniper after
the latter became a separate entity from E.ON), OMV, Wintershall and ENGIE agreed to build the
pipeline. Initially, construction was planned as a joint venture, 50 % owned by Gazprom and the
remainder split between the five EU partners, each contributing according to their share to the total
capital of 9.5 billion.
Objections were already raised in 2016 by the leaders of eight EU countries warning of the
geopolitical and energy security risks, and by UOKiK, Poland's competition authority, on the grounds
that the new pipeline would increase Gazprom's dominance of the country's gas market. To avoid
the risk of a UOKiK fine, the five EU energy companies decided to participate in the project as lenders
rather than shareholders; thus, instead of being set up as a joint venture, Nord Stream 2 AG, the
company building the pipeline, is a fully owned subsidiary of Gazprom.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690705/EPRS_BRI%282021%29690705_EN.pdf
not stopped its construction. The start of the project goes back to 2011, just after the first Nord
Stream pipeline was inaugurated, when Gazprom and a group of major European energy companies
decided to look into the possibility of doubling the capacity of the new undersea route. In 2015,
Gazprom and five EU companies Royal Dutch Shell, E.ON (subsequently replaced by Uniper after
the latter became a separate entity from E.ON), OMV, Wintershall and ENGIE agreed to build the
pipeline. Initially, construction was planned as a joint venture, 50 % owned by Gazprom and the
remainder split between the five EU partners, each contributing according to their share to the total
capital of 9.5 billion.
Objections were already raised in 2016 by the leaders of eight EU countries warning of the
geopolitical and energy security risks, and by UOKiK, Poland's competition authority, on the grounds
that the new pipeline would increase Gazprom's dominance of the country's gas market. To avoid
the risk of a UOKiK fine, the five EU energy companies decided to participate in the project as lenders
rather than shareholders; thus, instead of being set up as a joint venture, Nord Stream 2 AG, the
company building the pipeline, is a fully owned subsidiary of Gazprom.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/690705/EPRS_BRI%282021%29690705_EN.pdf
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Putin had to know this was going to happen. I wonder if he has a plan B such as the gas going ...
Botany
Feb 2022
#2
That pipeline isn't actually in use yet but would have been a faster route to western Europe
BumRushDaShow
Feb 2022
#7
As #5 below says, it's owned by Gazprom, and the Russian govt is the majority shareholder in that
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2022
#9
Wrong. Far from toothless. Much more expensive for Russia. No other markets close by. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2022
#14
excellent news-- Russia had a chance to peacefully join the European economy and they blew it
LymphocyteLover
Feb 2022
#28
So long as Germany rejects nuclear power they cannot quit coal or Russian natural gas.
hunter
Feb 2022
#24
I'm afraid that this may be a simply symbolic move that will be quietly overturned once things
artemisia1
Feb 2022
#39