Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Claire Oh Nette

(2,636 posts)
15. Nor will she ever have any same sex client couples...
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 01:41 PM
Feb 2022

My parents were Depression era babies. LGBT were strictly closeted. THose life long single aunts or uncles? Probably gay. (1%)

My birthparents were baby boomers--first cohort. LGBT still closeted, but they came of age in the 60s, so their minds were opened. (3%)

Mr. OhNette is later baby boom. In his later 60s, he has friends and colleagues who were out. Live and let live. (6%)


Gen X. We came of age with AIDS, and Reagan, so we knew Rock Hudson was gay, and Elton John, and Billie Jean King, and we remember how shitty people were to Ryan White. Our friends were dying not long after high school. (8%)

Millennials--even more open and tolerant. They were born into a world where LGBT folks existed. Like Technology, it's part of the fabric of their lives. (12%)

And finally, those coming of age now, Gen Z.
17% of those born after 2000 identify as LGBTQ. That's almost 20%.


20% means that horse has left the barn. Many of that Gen Z cohort were 14, 15, 16, 17 in 2020. They'll be olde enough to vote in 2022 and 2024.

Beau of the fifth column did a great video on this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why waste time on this cultural sh*t when we need decisions on sinkingfeeling Feb 2022 #1
Possibly, justices on the Supreme Court can walk and chew gum at the same time. mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2022 #2
Not this Supreme Court. Laser focused on bringing a sinkingfeeling Feb 2022 #3
This court is not looking to move away from the old days. n/m BradAllison Feb 2022 #5
THIS court will bluestarone Feb 2022 #4
by the same logic azureblue Feb 2022 #6
Doesn't seem like a sound business decision to me. LoisB Feb 2022 #7
It's a slippery slope to Freddie Feb 2022 #8
Who has standing? SomewhereInTheMiddle Feb 2022 #9
then they will refuse mixed race couples... the theocracy of white male only power is close JT45242 Feb 2022 #10
The SC opened this door with the baker's case. It will only get worse if they side with her. Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #11
From Joe.My.God.: mahatmakanejeeves Feb 2022 #12
Nor will she ever have any same sex client couples... Claire Oh Nette Feb 2022 #15
In cases like this where there are lots of options Sapient Donkey Feb 2022 #13
I predict this will be a 9-0 ruling hueymahl Feb 2022 #14
Just like the baker case I'm really having trouble understanding why this is a lawsuit jgmiller Feb 2022 #16
That could perhaps work, if refusing businesses.... moriah Feb 2022 #18
WRONG: It is not true that "any business has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason." onenote Feb 2022 #19
The Court will rule J_William_Ryan Feb 2022 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court to decide w...»Reply #15