Latest Breaking News

mountain grammy

(29,018 posts)

5. must control women no matter what..

Reply to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

Fri Mar 11, 2022, 02:01 PM

Mar 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Texas Supreme Court deals final blow to federal abortion law challenge [View all] LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 OP

they spent x amout of years and wasted monies so that women cant get healthcare AllaN01Bear Mar 2022 #1

At least there are pills now I guess. Lucky Luciano Mar 2022 #4

I bet State houses Rebl2 Mar 2022 #8

Except it's illegal to ship the pills within the state of Texas. Lonestarblue Mar 2022 #9

Well, the internet is where women will go to order their meds. CTyankee Mar 2022 #12

I don't know how they could even track such shipments, but it's in the law. Lonestarblue Mar 2022 #18

While the Comstock Laws are archaic melm00se Mar 2022 #28

Thanks for posting. That sheds light on why Republicans think they can make shipping pills illegal. Lonestarblue Mar 2022 #33

Well, people can get oxycodone and cocaine and fentanyl apparently readily jeffreyi Mar 2022 #29

Enforced by private citizens DBoon Mar 2022 #41

Hopefully the Dems can run against this in 2022. Don't let them texasize the nation. - n/t Jim__ Mar 2022 #2

Yes Virgina, THE SUPREME COURT DOES MATTER!!! JohnSJ Mar 2022 #3

must control women no matter what.. mountain grammy Mar 2022 #5

When will TX add the part about not letting women cross the border to get healthcare? CrispyQ Mar 2022 #6

I predict a "brain drain" which will befall the state of Texas. CTyankee Mar 2022 #7

I hope so Rebl2 Mar 2022 #10

Women of Texas... 2naSalit Mar 2022 #11

AGREE!!! bluestarone Mar 2022 #14

True NHvet Mar 2022 #15

This is awful but I don't understand the ruling and how it affects the challenge LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #13

Here's how the Texas Tribune explained it. Jim__ Mar 2022 #17

Right-- I don't understand how determining that medical licensing officials enforcing the law LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #20

I believe the key is the "private enforcement mechanism." Jim__ Mar 2022 #34

Yes but I'm not clear on why judges who rule on the abortion lawsuits aren't officials in charge of LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #44

Is there a possibile way to code women's reproductive rights into... Budi Mar 2022 #16

Good thought... but was VAWA actually reauthorized? LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #21

Just needs one more hurdle to jump over. Budi Mar 2022 #27

it is so ridiculous but Republithings are gonna be Rethuglicants LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #43

Texas... BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author turbinetree Mar 2022 #22

No they didn't FBaggins Mar 2022 #23

What about the legal principle that wnylib Mar 2022 #26

Not an unreasonable argument FBaggins Mar 2022 #32

But aren't judges who rule on the payments from people who sue responsible for enforcing the law??? LymphocyteLover Mar 2022 #24

From Elie Mystal: "...what makes abortion difficult is not some fancy lawyering from the right, ancianita Mar 2022 #25

Good thing Greg locked up all of the rapist? czarjak Mar 2022 #30

To all you MFer's who were SOOO concerned about Hillary's this or that I say Fuck YOU. NoMoreRepugs Mar 2022 #31

It's a step in the wrong direction Farmer-Rick Mar 2022 #35

Well. Gov Newsome used the SAME LAW - just changed abortion to Guns - To control Guns in CA. Tommymac Mar 2022 #36

Yeah, that's messed up too. Farmer-Rick Mar 2022 #39

YAY, TEXAS!! LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #37

There's essentially no way to stop private bounty hunters from violating the constitution LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2022 #38

Is there a loophole in this? SpankMe Mar 2022 #40

Time to leave Tejas, folks. paleotn Mar 2022 #42