Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Texas Supreme Court deals final blow to federal abortion law challenge [View all]melm00se
(5,164 posts)28. While the Comstock Laws are archaic
and have taken a Supreme Court hit, they are still on the books.
Section 2 of the Comstock Laws says:
That section one hundred and forty-eight of the act to revise, consolidate, and amend the statutes relating to the Post-office Department, approved June eighth, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, be amended to read as follows:
"Sec. 148. That no obscene, lewd, or lascivious book, pamphlet, picture, paper, print, or other publication of an indecent character, or any article or thing designed or intended for the prevention of conception or procuring of abortion, nor any article or thing intended or adapted for any indecent or immoral use or nature, nor any written or printed card, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement or notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, where, or how, or of whom, or by what means either of the things before mentioned may be obtained or made, nor any letter upon the envelope of which, or postal-card upon which indecent or scurrilous epithets may be written or printed, shall be carried in the mail, and any person who shall knowingly deposit, or cause to be deposited, for mailing or delivery, any of the hereinbefore-mentioned articles or things, or any notice, or paper containing any advertisement relating to the aforesaid articles or things, and any person who, in pursuance of any plan or scheme for disposing of any of the hereinbefore-mentioned articles or things, shall take, or cause to be taken, from the mail any such letter or package, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction thereof, shall, for every offense, be fined not less than one hundred dollars nor more than five thousand dollars, or imprisoned at hard labor not less than one year or more than ten years, or both, in the discretion of the judge."
So the laws are on the books and postal inspectors can act upon it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Texas Supreme Court deals final blow to federal abortion law challenge [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2022
OP
they spent x amout of years and wasted monies so that women cant get healthcare
AllaN01Bear
Mar 2022
#1
I don't know how they could even track such shipments, but it's in the law.
Lonestarblue
Mar 2022
#18
Thanks for posting. That sheds light on why Republicans think they can make shipping pills illegal.
Lonestarblue
Mar 2022
#33
Hopefully the Dems can run against this in 2022. Don't let them texasize the nation. - n/t
Jim__
Mar 2022
#2
When will TX add the part about not letting women cross the border to get healthcare?
CrispyQ
Mar 2022
#6
This is awful but I don't understand the ruling and how it affects the challenge
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2022
#13
Right-- I don't understand how determining that medical licensing officials enforcing the law
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2022
#20
Yes but I'm not clear on why judges who rule on the abortion lawsuits aren't officials in charge of
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2022
#44
But aren't judges who rule on the payments from people who sue responsible for enforcing the law???
LymphocyteLover
Mar 2022
#24
From Elie Mystal: "...what makes abortion difficult is not some fancy lawyering from the right,
ancianita
Mar 2022
#25
To all you MFer's who were SOOO concerned about Hillary's this or that I say Fuck YOU.
NoMoreRepugs
Mar 2022
#31
Well. Gov Newsome used the SAME LAW - just changed abortion to Guns - To control Guns in CA.
Tommymac
Mar 2022
#36
There's essentially no way to stop private bounty hunters from violating the constitution
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2022
#38