Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msfiddlestix

(8,183 posts)
17. I agree with you on the merits of the argument, I just don't believe she's telling the truth.
Mon Mar 14, 2022, 03:49 PM
Mar 2022

She merely attended a rally and then went home cuz she was cold.

That part I don't believe is the total sum of her involvement. It maybe the total sum of her physical involvement that day, but um financing and planning the logistical operations of the actual insurrection at the Capitol should still be under legal scrutiny.

And yes, her husband should be recused from any case that should come up connected to the insurrection. IMO.

But I know that ain't gonna happen. Even if she literally rode in a horse leading the charge, she wouldn't be held to account nor would her husband be forced to recuse.

Because no one (other than the blind followers) is going to be held to account I don't give an effin hell what our tag team of legal officials here say. none of them will be held to account.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can they put her in the room exboyfil Mar 2022 #1
Peter Navarro admitted to the conspiracy, "the Green Bay Sweep." Botany Mar 2022 #5
Firstly, Thomas should have never been confirmed. He and his wife are a disgrace. olegramps Mar 2022 #40
Time for a subpoena for Ginni, has a SC Justice wife ever taken the 5th? dem4decades Mar 2022 #2
Yep. Haul her ass in front of the committee Walleye Mar 2022 #10
Let's all say it together now. 4Q2u2 Mar 2022 #3
Agree. ananda Mar 2022 #14
Sounds like a challenge NQAS Mar 2022 #4
ms Thomas llashram Mar 2022 #6
I think the issue is she is the spouse of a USSC justice Phoenix61 Mar 2022 #7
There you have it. SHE'S AN ADVOCATE FOR ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT Achilleaze Mar 2022 #12
Tratior!!!! Initech Mar 2022 #8
I'd be interested in phone/ computer records. Up to her eyeballs is my suspicion. Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #9
This comment jayschool2013 Mar 2022 #11
Lock. Her. Up. And her creepy husband too. Hassler Mar 2022 #13
Thomas Slammer Mar 2022 #15
She's a lawyer. She knows exactly what is a statutory offense and what isn't. n/t barbaraann Mar 2022 #16
I agree with you on the merits of the argument, I just don't believe she's telling the truth. msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #17
weather Slammer Mar 2022 #19
I live in Northern California... our coldest days tend to be in the mid 50's.. msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #26
Didn't she fund insurrectionists? live love laugh Mar 2022 #18
yes she did. n/t msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #27
How can a Supreme Court justice maintain impartiality when his wife is taking part in a rally to Jetheels Mar 2022 #20
Thank you! Kid Berwyn Mar 2022 #36
She was a key player in organizing and funding the event during the run up to Jan.6th Ford_Prefect Mar 2022 #21
I'm all for women having a career BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #22
Yes, The Rally Itself May Be Protected Speech... GB_RN Mar 2022 #23
That means her husband believes the election was stolen. JohnnyRingo Mar 2022 #24
Ironically (Or Maybe Not)... GB_RN Mar 2022 #25
He should not be allowed to rule on any matter that relates to his wife's activities. NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #28
If he had an ounce of integrity he would resign.. agingdem Mar 2022 #31
So if your spouse turned out to be a murderer, should you be held accountable? NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #33
Thomas is complicit... agingdem Mar 2022 #34
If that is the case, then the thread should be about him, not his wife's activities. n/t NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #35
"... we don't launch or attend insurrections." L. Coyote Mar 2022 #29
Didn't Ginny also personally fund some of the buses transporting insurrectionists? dlk Mar 2022 #30
Read this: Ponietz Mar 2022 #32
Clearly a conflict of interest. Jetheels Mar 2022 #37
More than that -- prima facie evidence of conspiracy and fraud Ponietz Mar 2022 #39
i wonder how many roads connect traitor ginni to putin samsingh Mar 2022 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ginni Thomas, wife of Sup...»Reply #17