Latest Breaking News

NH Ethylene

(31,373 posts)

28. He should not be allowed to rule on any matter that relates to his wife's activities.

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Mon Mar 14, 2022, 06:41 PM

Mar 2022

That's it. Nobody should be locked up unless there is evidence of actual wrongdoing. And Thomas, though I loathe him, should not be otherwise penalized for his wife's activism.

Would we all like to be held account for the actions and beliefs of our spouses? We should not be pushing for consequences that we would not want Dems held to as well.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court justice, says she attended Jan. 6 'Stop-the-Steal' rally ... [View all] mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2022 OP

Can they put her in the room exboyfil Mar 2022 #1

Peter Navarro admitted to the conspiracy, "the Green Bay Sweep." Botany Mar 2022 #5

Firstly, Thomas should have never been confirmed. He and his wife are a disgrace. olegramps Mar 2022 #40

Time for a subpoena for Ginni, has a SC Justice wife ever taken the 5th? dem4decades Mar 2022 #2

Yep. Haul her ass in front of the committee Walleye Mar 2022 #10

Let's all say it together now. 4Q2u2 Mar 2022 #3

Agree. ananda Mar 2022 #14

Sounds like a challenge NQAS Mar 2022 #4

ms Thomas llashram Mar 2022 #6

I think the issue is she is the spouse of a USSC justice Phoenix61 Mar 2022 #7

There you have it. SHE'S AN ADVOCATE FOR ISSUES BEFORE THE COURT Achilleaze Mar 2022 #12

Tratior!!!! Initech Mar 2022 #8

I'd be interested in phone/ computer records. Up to her eyeballs is my suspicion. Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #9

This comment jayschool2013 Mar 2022 #11

Lock. Her. Up. And her creepy husband too. Hassler Mar 2022 #13

Thomas Slammer Mar 2022 #15

She's a lawyer. She knows exactly what is a statutory offense and what isn't. n/t barbaraann Mar 2022 #16

I agree with you on the merits of the argument, I just don't believe she's telling the truth. msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #17

weather Slammer Mar 2022 #19

I live in Northern California... our coldest days tend to be in the mid 50's.. msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #26

Didn't she fund insurrectionists? live love laugh Mar 2022 #18

yes she did. n/t msfiddlestix Mar 2022 #27

How can a Supreme Court justice maintain impartiality when his wife is taking part in a rally to Jetheels Mar 2022 #20

Thank you! Kid Berwyn Mar 2022 #36

She was a key player in organizing and funding the event during the run up to Jan.6th Ford_Prefect Mar 2022 #21

I'm all for women having a career BlueIdaho Mar 2022 #22

Yes, The Rally Itself May Be Protected Speech... GB_RN Mar 2022 #23

That means her husband believes the election was stolen. JohnnyRingo Mar 2022 #24

Ironically (Or Maybe Not)... GB_RN Mar 2022 #25

He should not be allowed to rule on any matter that relates to his wife's activities. NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #28

If he had an ounce of integrity he would resign.. agingdem Mar 2022 #31

So if your spouse turned out to be a murderer, should you be held accountable? NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #33

Thomas is complicit... agingdem Mar 2022 #34

If that is the case, then the thread should be about him, not his wife's activities. n/t NH Ethylene Mar 2022 #35

"... we don't launch or attend insurrections." L. Coyote Mar 2022 #29

Didn't Ginny also personally fund some of the buses transporting insurrectionists? dlk Mar 2022 #30

Read this: Ponietz Mar 2022 #32

Clearly a conflict of interest. Jetheels Mar 2022 #37

More than that -- prima facie evidence of conspiracy and fraud Ponietz Mar 2022 #39

i wonder how many roads connect traitor ginni to putin samsingh Mar 2022 #38