Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wuddles440

(2,091 posts)
39. Well,..
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 09:15 AM
Mar 2022

yes, that's the point! We need a voice(s) that powerfully amplify progressive messages and inform the masses of such. Timid and cowardly is neither inspirational nor aspirational.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No we don't. nt DURHAM D Mar 2022 #1
"no we don't" what? nt orleans Mar 2022 #18
"Management is worse than asleep at the switch." elleng Mar 2022 #2
bad mouthing the company where he wants to work? theres a job strategy nt msongs Mar 2022 #3
Because it's not worth it to him NJCher Mar 2022 #16
Keith was willing to use Maddow's production crew. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #34
that's great, but NJCher Mar 2022 #47
Olberman made Rachel Maddow montanacowboy Mar 2022 #4
This Might Have Got Me To Watch A News Channel Again SoCalDavidS Mar 2022 #5
I'll probably never watch corporate owned media again. Magoo48 Mar 2022 #23
Why would Maddow veto Olbermann? Big Blue Marble Mar 2022 #6
Yeah, I'm trying to understand it PatSeg Mar 2022 #43
Damn. *sigh* crickets Mar 2022 #7
So I guess gossip is LBN now JohnSJ Mar 2022 #8
Read the story. Olbermann confirmed it. ificandream Mar 2022 #9
Of course he did. He's probably pushing it. n/t pnwmom Mar 2022 #17
Keith won't toe the corporate line. Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #10
Which is why I hope a deal will be made somehow. We really could use him now. ificandream Mar 2022 #11
You can sure say that again! Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #12
I wish he would be able to return PlutosHeart Mar 2022 #13
Maybe move Hayes to the 9:00 pm slot PatSeg Mar 2022 #45
I would love to see Keith Olbermann back on MSNBC! lucca18 Mar 2022 #15
Bringing Keith back would increase their ratings...MSNBC is foolish BigmanPigman Mar 2022 #14
Keith olbermann is the source of this leak? Pricelss. Toxic, bitchy, dysfunctional. FreepFryer Mar 2022 #19
MSNBC sucks since Olbermann left...but yet they keep wallflower Chris Hayes?? Wanderlust988 Mar 2022 #20
Aha, I see you picked one of the 3 people who I watch on msnbc, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #36
Here, let me help you out. Paladin Mar 2022 #41
I really like Chris Hayes' show PatSeg Mar 2022 #46
CNN Has A Better Newsroom.. OhioTim Mar 2022 #21
Clash of styles IMO (Olbermann/RMS production team). Maddow made the right move. Auggie Mar 2022 #22
Keith offered to use her production team to produce the show. gab13by13 Mar 2022 #33
If Keith can't fill in for Rachel, then put him somewhere else. He's a voice that needs to be heard! Vinca Mar 2022 #24
Hmm... Mike Nelson Mar 2022 #25
Velshi, to me is the best fit for that time slot... and he has earned it over the past several years hlthe2b Mar 2022 #27
Exactly, MSNBC is moving farther to the right, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #30
I love Velshi. Wish he had a prime time show. Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #40
I like Keith, really miss him from Tv, but he shoots himself in the foot Mr. Sparkle Mar 2022 #26
2022 isn't 2011, Olbermann is older, and his YouTube series edgy even angry bucolic_frolic Mar 2022 #28
You mean like Fox? gab13by13 Mar 2022 #32
Did I miss something? Wuddles440 Mar 2022 #35
It would be preaching to the choir in my view /nt bucolic_frolic Mar 2022 #37
Well,.. Wuddles440 Mar 2022 #39
Olbermann made concessions, but was shot down, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #29
Face the facts people, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #31
Okay, so I think I get why Rachel may have vetoed Keith, if she did.. Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #38
I think the problem is that, gab13by13 Mar 2022 #42
Yes, MSNBC Might Make Up for "Countdown Iraq"! McKim Mar 2022 #44
*LOCKING* Spazito Mar 2022 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MSNBC Almost Brought Back...»Reply #39