Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

MarineCombatEngineer

(18,187 posts)

4. Ok, he's impeached in the House,

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 03:39 PM

Mar 2022

now what?

I applaud them for calling for his impeachment, but the stark reality is that he won't be convicted and removed by the Senate, no matter how much he deserves to be removed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Women's March pushes for impeachment of Justice Thomas over wife's texts [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2022 OP

K&R hamsterjill Mar 2022 #1

He never should have been a confirmed Justice. Evolve Dammit Mar 2022 #2

K & R . . . Lovie777 Mar 2022 #3

Ok, he's impeached in the House, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2022 #4

It wouldn't even get that far FBaggins Mar 2022 #21

I agree, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2022 #22

Ginni Thomas is not the property of Clarence Thomas. Jacson6 Mar 2022 #5

But what if vice versa? bucolic_frolic Mar 2022 #9

Right and it's just a coincidence choie Mar 2022 #20

Why would Trump have Thomas's wife's texts to Mark Meadows? marie999 Mar 2022 #24

"King of Kings"? Diamond_Dog Mar 2022 #6

I think spouses are bound, in many states, by the contracts of each other. bucolic_frolic Mar 2022 #7

No, we shouldn't impeach someone for the actions of their spouse. NYC Liberal Mar 2022 #8

He failed to recuse himself in multiple cases spooky3 Mar 2022 #14

Only if he was complicit in his wife's activities ProudMNDemocrat Mar 2022 #10

What about his judgements n briefs.. Deuxcents Mar 2022 #11

No thatdemguy Mar 2022 #15

WOW!!!!! Josh Marshall @joshtpm �Hypothetical: Can a Supreme Court Justice credibly carry Trueblue1968 Mar 2022 #12

THAT is the correct question! 2naSalit Mar 2022 #17

Incredibly ironic of them Polybius Mar 2022 #13

So was SC Justice Thomas incredibly ignorant of his wife's work... sanatanadharma Mar 2022 #16

He was the only desenting vote paleotn Mar 2022 #18

Rt💕🤷‍♂️TY! Cha Mar 2022 #19

Um, no, sad to say Warpy Mar 2022 #23