Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: Federal District Court Strikes Down Restrictive Florida Voting Rules, Imposes Requirement [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(179,495 posts)24. Florida must seek court preapproval to change some voting laws, judge rules
This is a major ruling on imposing preclearance on Florida
Link to tweet
Florida cannot change certain voting laws without getting preapproval from a federal court for the next decade, a federal judge ruled on Thursday, saying the state has an ongoing and extensive history of discrimination against non-white voters that warranted extraordinary oversight.
US district judge Mark Walker put the state back under preclearance on Thursday as part of a 288-page ruling striking down new voting restrictions in Florida limiting the availability of drop boxes, and making it more difficult for third-party groups to register voters. Florida has repeatedly, recently, and persistently acted to deny Black Floridians access to the franchise, he wrote in his opinion.
Placing a state under federal preclearance is an extraordinary, and rarely used, action. A provision of the Voting Rights Act allows judges to place jurisdictions under federal supervision if there is evidence of intentional discrimination. Until Thursday, courts have not placed any states back under supervision since the supreme courts 2013 decision in Shelby County v Holder.
US district judge Mark Walker put the state back under preclearance on Thursday as part of a 288-page ruling striking down new voting restrictions in Florida limiting the availability of drop boxes, and making it more difficult for third-party groups to register voters. Florida has repeatedly, recently, and persistently acted to deny Black Floridians access to the franchise, he wrote in his opinion.
Placing a state under federal preclearance is an extraordinary, and rarely used, action. A provision of the Voting Rights Act allows judges to place jurisdictions under federal supervision if there is evidence of intentional discrimination. Until Thursday, courts have not placed any states back under supervision since the supreme courts 2013 decision in Shelby County v Holder.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: Federal District Court Strikes Down Restrictive Florida Voting Rules, Imposes Requirement [View all]
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2022
OP
No, they're too busy prosecuting the planners of the insurrection.
Dark n Stormy Knight
Mar 2022
#33
Sadly, this is why I don't get all excited when lower court make these types of rulings.
33taw
Mar 2022
#17
Florida must seek court preapproval to change some voting laws, judge rules
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2022
#24