Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(33,788 posts)
7. The IRS Gives Energy Investors a Gift
Sun Nov 4, 2012, 05:42 PM
Nov 2012
http://investorplace.com/2012/10/the-irs-gives-energy-investors-a-gift/

The IRS Gives Energy Investors a Gift
New ruling is good for chemical MLPs and income seekers


With their high and potentially tax-deferred income, investors have been chomping at the bit get their hands on every master limited partnership (MLP) unit in sight. Aside from the typical 5% to 8% dividends these firms kick out, roughly 80% of the taxes on distributions are deferred until investors sell their partnership shares.

That makes them quite lucrative for shareholders willing to put up with the additional tax-time reporting hassles that come with owning MLPs — and considering that the Federal Reserve’s low interest rate policies aren’t ending anytime soon.

On top of that, there are plenty of advantages for firms that set-up or spin-off operations into the tax structure. And for some them, those rewards are about to get even better.

New IRS Ruling
Changes to the tax code back in 1986 allowed for pipeline firms to be structured as partnerships in order to stimulate construction of domestic energy infrastructure. This allowed MLPs to avoid paying corporate taxes by passing on most of their free cash flow as tax-deferred distributions to investors.

That partnership structure provides plenty of benefits on the corporate level for sponsors. Aside from avoiding taxation issues, MLPs provide their general partners (GPs) — i.e. the sponsoring refining firms — generous distribution payouts.

Those payouts get even juicer thanks to the continued relationship between GPs and their publicly traded MLP subsidiaries. After acquiring new pipelines or gathering facilities, GPs will often pass along or “drop down” some of the prime assets into their MLPs.

This allows the MLP to grow its distributable cash flow. These asset sales are priced at a level that guarantees cash flow accretion for the MLPs and enables the MLPs to raise distributions at a faster rate. The general partner benefits directly from increased distributions on the limited partner units it owns as well as from increased incentive distributions — all while avoiding taxation on those assets.

Not every firm meets the requirements of becoming a MLP. The section of the tax code specifically lays out that those businesses whose “income and gains [are] derived from the exploration, development, mining or production, processing, refining, transportation or the marketing of any mineral or natural resources” can qualify. While some “non-energy” MLPs do exist — like timber firm Pope Resources (NASDAQ: POPE) — the bulk of the focus on transportation or extracting of hydrocarbons.

Well, for now, but a new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruling could change that.

Last week, the IRS ruled that income from steam crackers — plants that are designed to processing natural gas liquids (NGLs) into chemicals called olefins — qualify for the MLP operating structure. The IRS also said that income from marketing, transporting and storing these olefins qualifies as MLP income.

Olefin and ethane production in the U.S. is expected to surge as current producers have access to huge and cheap reserves brought about by the hydraulic and fracturing revolution. Overall, analysts expect North American olefin manufacturers to generate substantial operating income until significant new NGL cracking capacity is built — probably sometime in 2018.


More at Link

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pennsylvania Report Left ...»Reply #7