Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: AOC Touts Blocking Supreme Court Security Bill After Kavanaugh Threat [View all]ripcord
(5,553 posts)63. Wait until the ads
"Democrats didn't get their way on several Supreme Court decisions so after Justice Kavanaungh was threatened by an assassin they refused to provide protection for them in the hopes that certain Justices who didn't support their positions would be assassinated."
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
AOC Touts Blocking Supreme Court Security Bill After Kavanaugh Threat [View all]
867-5309.
Jun 2022
OP
A human justice would say, "See to the nation's children first, then we'll return to this."
Magoo48
Jun 2022
#11
EVERYONE is in jeopardy everyday that these war weapons are on the street.
onecaliberal
Jun 2022
#18
I was thinking the same thing. Pair the two items together. Force Repubs to vote against it.
LonePirate
Jun 2022
#4
Well, this progressive disagrees with you totally. IMO AOC is doing the right thing.
Tommymac
Jun 2022
#21
I don't give a fuck if OUR SIDE supplies them with "yet another video clip"
Ferrets are Cool
Jun 2022
#41
Then Democrats can have a commercial showing how fast they move when THEY are threatened
Escurumbele
Jun 2022
#46
The GQP wasn't concerned about mid-terms when blocking popular gun control measures
867-5309.
Jun 2022
#34
I wonder if they'd be that concerned if a gunman was found near, say, Justice Sotomayor's home.
catbyte
Jun 2022
#27
Many posts here seem to suggest for Democrats to think hard before they say anything to make sure
Escurumbele
Jun 2022
#47