Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Top British official orders Julian Assange's extradition to U.S. [View all]xocetaceans
(4,442 posts)63. Thanks for the link.
All that happened then is something that I mostly remember; the debate scheduling, etc.
The interesting thing to me is that some people are so willing to forget their principles. About the same small group always crops up to act seemingly as an anti-Assange chorus if news of Assange breaks. The larger issue of freedom of the press never comes up in their discussions. It's as if they cannot think past this one situation to the ramifications of such a prosecution.
Anyway, thanks for the refresher on the earlier situation. It's important to keep the events straight.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top British official orders Julian Assange's extradition to U.S. [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Jun 2022
OP
A new chapter in the saga. Will Pamela Anderson and his other loving supporters be there
hlthe2b
Jun 2022
#3
I seem to remember there were some pretty good knock down fights about this guy.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2022
#7
It's not really about the man. Instead, it's about the constitutional freedom of the press....
xocetaceans
Jun 2022
#12
He is being extradited for suspicion of distributing stolen property, not for being a journalist.
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#14
The information at the base of the prosecution was *provided* by a US Servicemember
oioioi
Jun 2022
#16
The information was "provided" to Assange by Manning, as well as a known Russian spy outfit.
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#21
You bet! Distributing stolen property directly relates to, drumroll please, property Manning stole
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#27
So we agree that Russia is not mentioned in the charges, that's a start - remaining fallacies...
oioioi
Jun 2022
#28
I have no idea why you are so intent on hypothetically extraditing me to Colombia.
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#32
Because extraditing you to Colombia for maligning their drug lords would help you empathize
oioioi
Jun 2022
#43
You can call it "disclosing (national defense) information", like the charges do
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2022
#30
Since Manning was charged earlier with stealing the said document in a sparate indictment,
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#48
Your wiki calls them 'records', not property. "Stolen government property" is your own phrase
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2022
#53
Ok, it took me a while, but here's the actual press release of Manning's verdict:
Beastly Boy
Jun 2022
#75
You said it is "for suspicion of distributing stolen property, not for being a journalist"
muriel_volestrangler
Jun 2022
#82
+1 it's amazing how easily political persecution of a journalist becomes OK when it suits.
oioioi
Jun 2022
#25
Yes, it's remarkable how malleable the views of supposedly progressive thinkers are
oioioi
Jun 2022
#65
So him just being in a UK prison like anybody who breaks the law in the UK is "torture" lol
EX500rider
Jun 2022
#33
My post was a tongue in cheek post, not meant to be taken seriously.
MarineCombatEngineer
Jun 2022
#73
So, if he is extradited we could learn a lot, if he isn't killed first, including..
Joinfortmill
Jun 2022
#8