Latest Breaking News

ancianita

(43,178 posts)

44. A thousand thanks for all the links, B!

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:04 AM

Jul 2022

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden administration says federal law preempts state abortion bans when emergency care is needed [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 OP

More of this sort of action, please! LonePirate Jul 2022 #1

This is a good, but I have no doubt that someone will challenge this all the way up to the SC, and JohnSJ Jul 2022 #2

Came here to say the same thing! ShazzieB Jul 2022 #16

Yes JohnSJ Jul 2022 #19

"You want medical personnel to stand by and watch a woman die before their eyes?" CTyankee Jul 2022 #24

This is an executive order, not legislation, I don't think the SC gets to weigh in localroger Jul 2022 #3

The E.O. is doing what? BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #4

Thanks for the clarification /nt localroger Jul 2022 #28

Executive orders can absolutely be challenged in court Willis88 Jul 2022 #11

EMTALA is a statute, not an EO. Piratedog Jul 2022 #20

EMTALA is guidance though. EO says it will be enforced per new guidelines /nt. localroger Jul 2022 #27

"EMTALA is guidance" BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #32

Executive Orders are frequently shot down by the SC LeftInTX Jul 2022 #29

Kick for PJB.. Kick for DEMS!! TY! Cha Jul 2022 #5

K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue Jul 2022 #6

While on the one hand I love this, it's necessary and good to remind providers of Federal Law Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2022 #7

This is not ceding ground at all. Novara Jul 2022 #13

It's not a 'huge fucking deal' because it's just a reminder that the laws for this already exist Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2022 #61

"Feel like we really need to fight for ALL choice" BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #18

What states does this preempt? FBaggins Jul 2022 #8

No certain or doctors may be afraid to try due to possible prosecution from the state Willis88 Jul 2022 #12

Some asshole wrote a law that would make doctors re-implant ectopic pregnancies Novara Jul 2022 #14

You have to be kidding. This is sick ecstatic Jul 2022 #63

I am not kidding Novara Jul 2022 #64

Here is the problem BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #15

They do... summer_in_TX Jul 2022 #17

SC does for the time being stage left Jul 2022 #45

I believe the SC "no exceptions" bill is really "no exceptions for rape/incest" FBaggins Jul 2022 #47

Kick & R DemocraticPatriot Jul 2022 #9

Wonderful news for women with incomplete miscarriages. In Texas women have to wait for deadly flying_wahini Jul 2022 #10

well, at least until the 6 fascist kings and queen say different. nt yaesu Jul 2022 #21

I didn't think guidance docs were binding. OneCrazyDiamond Jul 2022 #22

HHS is sending a letter to healthcare providers BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #23

I hope it works. OneCrazyDiamond Jul 2022 #31

See here where a portion of the statue was included in the post BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #34

I think it is the right thing to do OneCrazyDiamond Jul 2022 #50

Well in the case of the EPA & CO2 BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #52

Not "clinics and practices" FBaggins Jul 2022 #37

Yes - any entity that accepts federal funding - notably Medicare BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #39

Abortion clinics can't receive federal funding FBaggins Jul 2022 #40

Nowhere do I say "abortion clinics" BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #41

OB-GYNs transfer emergency patients to hospital ERs, not the other way around FBaggins Jul 2022 #42

You are again missing the full depth and breadth of what can happen to a woman BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #43

I don't disagree with the vast majority of what you're saying FBaggins Jul 2022 #51

Regarding this BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #53

You may have started your reply before my "on edit" FBaggins Jul 2022 #54

It does not say "ER". BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #55

I gave you the text from the current HHS notice FBaggins Jul 2022 #56

And I gave you the text to the statute that they are referencing BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #57

No you didn't. You gave me your own *interpretation* of a piece of the text. FBaggins Jul 2022 #58

And my last reply before the hearing starts since I'm hosting the live threads BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #59

Ok. Hope the hosting goes well. I'll try to drop in. FBaggins Jul 2022 #60

BIG K&R! Bayard Jul 2022 #25

*2. n/t iluvtennis Jul 2022 #26

K&R betsuni Jul 2022 #30

Tell me we're going to go through another nullification crisis! AZLD4Candidate Jul 2022 #33

They will be playing with fire if that happens... BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #35

healthcare folk should not fear being sued Skittles Jul 2022 #36

Per what I posted above from the statute associated with the "EMTALA" that is referenced BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #38

A thousand thanks for all the links, B! ancianita Jul 2022 #44

LOL BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #46

RIGHT?! ancianita Jul 2022 #48

HA! BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #49

Assuming doctors with that skillset will even hang around the Gilead states ecstatic Jul 2022 #62