Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
16. The key, and impossible passage here is this:
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 04:35 PM
Nov 2012

The key, and probably impossible passage here is this:

"That does not mean a conservative cannot become president. A pragmatic fiscal conservative with an enlightened view of immigration and a tolerant attitude on social issues could do quite well. Romney could have run as just such a candidate."

The problem here is that "social issues" are lost for the Republicans on two fronts:

First, there is this underlying fear of any kind of "handout" program. There is an underlying fear that someone, somewhere, is abusing welfare. There is this over-arching, incorrect feeling that most people, given the chance, would rather be deadbeats than productive. If you give someone who is hungry food, you will somehow breed legions of people who don't want to work for food. If you give someone who is sick or injured free health care, the quality of the care must be terrible.

There is an absolute refusal to acknowledge any benefit that taxpayer-funded services might have given them in their lifetimes. There is an absolute refusal, even disdain for the idea that virtually no one in modern society is entirely self-made.

I don't see this attitude changing.

The second, and bigger, problem here is that many of these "social issues" are really "religious issues". Birth control. Abortion. Contraception. Gay marriage. The problem here, as someone else pointed out, is that the Republican/Conservative population is essentially living in Victorian times, or rather they like to tell everyone they are. Like the Baptists who refuse to look each other in the eye when they bump into each other at the liquor store, Republican/Conservatives talk a good game about "family values" but invariably they are the ones with wide stances or some other peccadillo. I remember a study that showed that since 1945 something like 95+% of people had pre-marital sex. To hear the Republican/Conservatives talk, though, everyone before 1960 was a candidate for monasteries and convents.

Modern social morals concerning sexuality have changed, and drastically, even from when I was a teenager 20+ years ago. When I was coming of age, finding an uncle's Playboy was some serious shit. Today's kids have the internet, and are exposed to every kind of kink you can possibly imagine. Their attitudes towards sex are light-years more liberal than my generation. Today's young adults embrace sexuality and expect to be able to enjoy sex routinely and casually. That means unquestionable access to contraception and abortion. And it means and end to trying to legislate who can get married and who can't based on who has a penis or not.

And that attitude I don't ever see changing. The Republican/Conservative population is the final political refuge of the religious nuts. It is who they are. It defines them. Thus expecting them to change their attitudes on any social issue that revolves around sexuality is a complete lost cause.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

hate is not a solution - FoxNews, Limbaugh, etc have no solutions, just hate tomm2thumbs Nov 2012 #1
I certainly hope the choking has begun. defacto7 Nov 2012 #19
hopefully those that finally realized they have been lied to these past months start to get it tomm2thumbs Nov 2012 #26
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Dubster Nov 2012 #2
They have driven all the decent Eisenhower AsahinaKimi Nov 2012 #4
That is an awesome piece of writing! lexw Nov 2012 #3
excellent Samjm Nov 2012 #5
I have always maintained SemperEadem Nov 2012 #6
QUICK, Call John Boehner bucolic_frolic Nov 2012 #7
They're trying to set up Jeb bush as such a man. loudsue Nov 2012 #8
And...... JPK Nov 2012 #11
The coming GOP war is going to be awesome to behold. Mr.Turnip Nov 2012 #9
I'm rooting for every side in that war! Ikonoklast Nov 2012 #21
They say "doomed to become a party of the past" like it's a bad thing. woofless Nov 2012 #10
Re: The republican party JPK Nov 2012 #13
It was his primary pandering xxqqqzme Nov 2012 #12
I would agree, but the GOP won the house happyslug Nov 2012 #14
Republicans don't learn lessons CanonRay Nov 2012 #15
The key, and impossible passage here is this: Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #16
"an underlying fear that someone, somewhere, is abusing welfare" (they 'target' the wrong 'someone') Amonester Nov 2012 #18
A lot of it boils down to racism. Racism has poisoned the idea of public good in the U.S. yardwork Nov 2012 #30
BINGO...WE Have A Winner 1ProudAtheist Nov 2012 #17
Harsh yes, a lesson? That waits to be seen. defacto7 Nov 2012 #20
I'm thrilled that Obama won, and... olddad56 Nov 2012 #22
They rode the hate train for several decades, so you knew stubtoe Nov 2012 #23
They will never re-@$$e$$ the strategy. They will only double-down... Amonester Nov 2012 #25
I want to take issue with the second sentence. Left Coast2020 Nov 2012 #24
Kicked and rec''d for REALITY~ BeHereNow Nov 2012 #27
Yeah, 'cause they're sure to learn from this loss. DCKit Nov 2012 #28
If there's one thing cranky old rightwing white men are good at, Arugula Latte Nov 2012 #29
the Supreme Court will be going Liberal lovuian Nov 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama's victory is a hars...»Reply #16