Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(6,115 posts)
2. Would that even be admissible in a request for a new trial?
Sat Sep 10, 2022, 05:56 AM
Sep 2022

Some yahoo says what now? I mean, anybody could make anything up and say someone was biased. It isn't a private citizen's job to determine bias. This is done during jury selection. They seated this juror, so I'm thinking that the juror said they could be impartial and the lawyers and court agreed. Jurors are instructed to decide based on the law and the case presented, not their opinions.

So unless they told their co-workers that they'd convict these assholes no matter what if they were seated, I doubt this is even admissible.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DOJ allows it. gab13by13 Sep 2022 #1
Yep, just like jury nullification for abortion and drug-related trials ck4829 Sep 2022 #3
Would that even be admissible in a request for a new trial? Novara Sep 2022 #2
I'm more concerned Karma13612 Sep 2022 #4
Norms and standard decency are gone. rubbersole Sep 2022 #6
This is true. 2naSalit Sep 2022 #13
I think (hope) the midterms will be a start. rubbersole Sep 2022 #14
The ends justify the means yankee87 Sep 2022 #21
Also true. 2naSalit Sep 2022 #22
Anyone who votes for the current fascist repuglicans needs to know SouthernDem4ever Sep 2022 #25
Very very true..nt Karma13612 Sep 2022 #16
That's got to be one of the worst-written headlines I've ever seen Orrex Sep 2022 #5
I agree. When I first read it, I was thinking "What was she convicted Karma13612 Sep 2022 #17
I just went to their site and Karma13612 Sep 2022 #19
Isn't this jury-tampering. Inherently threatening to be visiting their work place? Nt lostnfound Sep 2022 #7
I should have read your entry first before I posted close to the same question. I would like an Escurumbele Sep 2022 #11
It happened after the jury was finished and dismissed, so wnylib Sep 2022 #15
But, this is going to a former juror's Karma13612 Sep 2022 #18
A pity they haven't been sentenced yet. I hate these damn delays. paleotn Sep 2022 #8
One would think that qualifies as "Jury Tampering"?, would it not? Or "Jury Intimidation"??? Escurumbele Sep 2022 #9
Who is funding their legal representation and KPN Sep 2022 #10
The attorneys need to be intimidated. LiberalFighter Sep 2022 #12
Juror bias should be rooted out! During the actual jury selection... dchill Sep 2022 #20
Can't they tell these "investigators" to take a hike? n/t MarcA Sep 2022 #23
That title is journalism at its worst. Sounds like the Gov was convicted bucolic_frolic Sep 2022 #24
Right? mahina Sep 2022 #26
Ummmmm, blue-wave Sep 2022 #27
I was on a criminal jury a couple of years ago. It is not just "do you have a bias". mackdaddy Sep 2022 #28
But again the ultimate thing was: can you put your biases aside and make a decision base only on the SouthernDem4ever Sep 2022 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Convicted Michigan Gov. G...»Reply #2