Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,625 posts)

9. You're kidding, right?

Reply to intheflow (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 27, 2022, 05:54 PM

Sep 2022

If anything, it's our side that was "shopping". This judge has already ruled that the TX abortion law was unconstitutional.

He was overturned of course... but he's no MAGA judge. If there's any way to rule against Paxton, Judge Pitman is the man to do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge rules Texas attorney general does not have to appear at hearing on abortion lawsuit [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2022 OP

What backwater district did they judge-shop for this verdict? intheflow Sep 2022 #1

You're kidding, right? FBaggins Sep 2022 #9

Subpoena quashed records sealed Fullduplexxx Sep 2022 #2

Too bad this process server did not have it on tape. I will believe the server, NOT Paxton the riversedge Sep 2022 #6

What the hell is he so afraid of? ShazzieB Sep 2022 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author ShazzieB Sep 2022 #4

I don't understand this double ruling. ananda Sep 2022 #5

It may indeed be the basis for the case, but we should hope not FBaggins Sep 2022 #10

That's not a birthmark on Paxton's ass, that's lipstick. n/t malthaussen Sep 2022 #7

another cowardly Repuke pfitz59 Sep 2022 #8

Any lawyer that can answer this question? Linda Ed Sep 2022 #11