Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(164,939 posts)
Thu Oct 13, 2022, 10:14 AM Oct 2022

UPDATE: Florida jury spares Parkland school gunman from death penalty [View all]

Last edited Thu Oct 13, 2022, 01:10 PM - Edit history (3)

Source: Reuters

Oct 13 (Reuters) - A Florida jury on Thursday decided to spare Nikolas Cruz, the gunman who killed 17 people in 2018 at a high school in the city of Parkland, from the death penalty, instead calling for life in prison.

Some family members of victims shook their heads in the Fort Lauderdale courtroom as the jury rejected the prosecution's request for the death penalty for Cruz in one of the deadliest school shootings in U.S. history, determining that aggravating factors were outweighed by mitigating circumstances.

Cruz, 24, pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, about 30 miles (50 km) north of Fort Lauderdale. Cruz used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members.

The sentencing trial, held after Cruz's guilty plea, lasted three months. Jurors began their deliberations on Wednesday. Under Florida law, a jury must be unanimous in its decision to recommend that a judge sentence Cruz to be executed. The only other option in the case was life in prison.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/florida-jury-has-reached-verdict-parkland-shooter-case-media-reports-2022-10-13/



Last updates/headlines -

UPDATE: Florida jury says man who confessed to Parkland school shooting should be sentenced to life

Oct 13 (Reuters) - Jurors determined Thursday that Nikolas Cruz should be sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole for a 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people. Jurors determined in each of 17 murders that mitigating circumstances outweighed aggravating factors, so the death penalty was not supported.

Cruz, 24, had pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. He used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members in one of the deadliest school shootings in American history.

The prosecution during the three-month sentencing trial had argued Cruz's crime was both premeditated as well as heinous and cruel, which are among the criteria that Florida law establishes for deciding on a death sentence.

Cruz's defense team had acknowledged the severity of his crimes, but asked jurors to consider mitigating factors including lifelong mental health disorders resulting from his biological mother's substance abuse during pregnancy.


Oct 13 (Reuters) - Jurors determined Thursday that Nikolas Cruz should be sentenced to death for a 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people. Jurors determined in at least one of the murders that there were aggravating factors that would support a death sentence, but in other cases they did not.

Cruz, 24, had pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. He used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members in one of the deadliest school shootings in American history.

The prosecution during the three-month sentencing trial had argued Cruz's crime was both premeditated as well as heinous and cruel, which are among the criteria that Florida law establishes for deciding on a death sentence. Cruz's defense team had acknowledged the severity of his crimes, but asked jurors to consider mitigating factors including lifelong mental health disorders resulting from his biological mother's substance abuse during pregnancy.

Under Florida law, a death sentence could only have been handed down if jurors had unanimously recommended he be executed. The only other option was life in prison. Cruz, who at the time of the shooting was 19 and had been expelled from the high school, had apologized for his crimes and asked to be given a life sentence without the possibility of parole in order to dedicate his life to helping others.


Article updated for MULTIPLE counts. Article headline updated again! Apparently the news sources are responding to each count.

Previous update and headline -

UPDATE: Florida jury says man who confessed to Parkland school shooting should be sentenced to death

Oct 13 (Reuters) - Jurors determined Thursday that Nikolas Cruz should be sentenced to death for a 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people. Jurors determined in at least one of the murders that there were aggravating factors that would support a death sentence, but in other cases they did not.

Cruz, 24, had pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. He used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members in one of the deadliest school shootings in American history. The prosecution during the three-month sentencing trial had argued Cruz's crime was both premeditated as well as heinous and cruel, which are among the criteria that Florida law establishes for deciding on a death sentence.

Cruz's defense team had acknowledged the severity of his crimes, but asked jurors to consider mitigating factors including lifelong mental health disorders resulting from his biological mother's substance abuse during pregnancy. Under Florida law, a death sentence could only have been handed down if jurors had unanimously recommended he be executed. The only other option was life in prison.

Cruz, who at the time of the shooting was 19 and had been expelled from the high school, had apologized for his crimes and asked to be given a life sentence without the possibility of parole in order to dedicate his life to helping others. The sentencing proceedings included testimony from survivors of the shooting as well as cellphone videos in which terrified students cried for help or spoke in hushed whispers as they hid. The Parkland shooting had led to renewed calls for tighter gun control in the United States.


UPDATE:

Jurors determined in at least one of the murders that there were aggravating factors that would support a death sentence, but in other cases they did not.


Original article and headline -

Florida jury says man who confessed to Parkland school shooting should be sentenced to life

Oct 13 (Reuters) - Jurors determined Thursday that Nikolas Cruz should be sentenced to life in prison for a 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people. Cruz, 24, had pleaded guilty last year to premeditated murder at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

He used a semi-automatic rifle to kill 14 students and three staff members in one of the deadliest school shootings in American history. The prosecution during the three-month sentencing trial had argued Cruz's crime was both premeditated as well as heinous and cruel, which are among the criteria that Florida law establishes for deciding on a death sentence.

Cruz's defense team had acknowledged the severity of his crimes, but asked jurors to consider mitigating factors including lifelong mental health disorders resulting from his biological mother's substance abuse during pregnancy.

Under Florida law, a death sentence could only have been handed down if jurors had unanimously recommended he be executed. The only other option was life in prison. Cruz, who at the time of the shooting was 19 and had been expelled from the high school, had apologized for his crimes and asked to be given a life sentence without the possibility of parole in order to dedicate his life to helping others.
93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should have got the death penalty. Meadowoak Oct 2022 #1
Agreed The Grand Illuminist Oct 2022 #61
Definitely nt Raine Oct 2022 #92
Curious to know the jury split. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #2
i dunno...my grandmother was a murder victim and IF they had ever found the guy who did it samnsara Oct 2022 #4
His guilt was never at issue. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #6
That's Your Opinion SoCalDavidS Oct 2022 #12
There's really not any circumstances where I see it as warranted. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #19
Agree To Disagree SoCalDavidS Oct 2022 #24
Vote Was 11-1 In Favor Of Death SoCalDavidS Oct 2022 #59
Our Tampa news stations reported the jury vote was 9-3. 24601 Oct 2022 #93
The penalty phase is a required part of a trial csziggy Oct 2022 #28
agreed gopiscrap Oct 2022 #43
Peace to her mahina Oct 2022 #13
im watching a delayed version i guess as so far they all say hes eligible for death sentence samnsara Oct 2022 #3
The People He Murdered Are The Ones Who Got The Death Sentence SoCalDavidS Oct 2022 #17
It's time to move on from "an eye for an eye" BuddhaGirl Oct 2022 #56
I am confused. SuperCoder Oct 2022 #5
A death sentence required a unanimous verdict. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #9
Note the update - there were multiple verdicts and now the report is at least one is for "death" BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #18
in florida? wow catsudon Oct 2022 #7
You don't know much about Broward County, do you? Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #10
Apparently this was a multi-part verdict and at least one charge received a penalty of "death" BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #14
If a law makes execution possible, does it create a "need" or duty to execute? Hortensis Oct 2022 #22
Do we thirst for justice or vengeance? nt hay rick Oct 2022 #8
Vengeance. That's the Christian way. Lonestarblue Oct 2022 #16
LOL. Now I remember why I haven't been to church in recent decades. hay rick Oct 2022 #23
If that's true sarisataka Oct 2022 #31
Yes, it's not just "Christians" and Repubicans. hay rick Oct 2022 #58
NOTE UPDATE - One charge was for "death" and the others "life" BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #15
Really? SoCalDavidS Oct 2022 #21
All the initial breakings were "life", then they switched to "death' BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #25
Why would one of the deaths meet the standard, but not the others? niyad Oct 2022 #20
I think there were aggravating factors in one case SheltieLover Oct 2022 #30
Just got in from walking the dogs. WinstonSmith4740 Oct 2022 #26
God...life in prison... SuperCoder Oct 2022 #27
You're blaming "red states" on the refusal to impose the death penalty? Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #34
No, life in prison is a worst sentence than death csziggy Oct 2022 #44
Nonsense ...If that were true he would have begged for the d.p. instead of life without Fullduplexxx Oct 2022 #53
With the death penalty, he would still spend much of his life in prison csziggy Oct 2022 #55
Sorry, I have to LOL at the irony sarisataka Oct 2022 #46
Interesting times, my friend XorXor Oct 2022 #70
So which is it? The title said death but the update says life? you should edit question everything Oct 2022 #29
The OP's headline is wrong obamanut2012 Oct 2022 #33
Looks as if news keeps updating the story. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #35
Nobody's pardoning Nicolas Cruz. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #37
One never knows. SheltieLover Oct 2022 #41
Yes, they'll pardon Nikolas Cruz. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #45
Consider that KY Gov who pardoned a bunch of people who committed brutal crimes SheltieLover Oct 2022 #51
Jury recommends life without parole, shooter avoids death penalty Shanti Shanti Shanti Oct 2022 #40
LBN rules state the header must show the actual headline obamanut2012 Oct 2022 #32
Then it should be locked and start a new one question everything Oct 2022 #36
The source is correct -- the OP's is wrong obamanut2012 Oct 2022 #39
Yes - they have updated it multiple times (as have AP and CNN) BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #38
The link you provide to Reuter's has a title that says "sentenced to life" - Earthrise Oct 2022 #42
Yes - they (along with CNN and others) are reacting to verdicts for "counts" - updated again BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #49
ADDITIONAL UPDATE - various news sources are reacting to charges for different counts BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #47
The verdict is life without parole, although the sentencing hearing was put off to Nov 1 JudyM Oct 2022 #48
In dynamic situations sarisataka Oct 2022 #50
Oh I know BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #54
Did do his Rittenhouse cry ...." help others " good lord 🙄 Fullduplexxx Oct 2022 #52
Fake empathy conned some of the jurors. honest.abe Oct 2022 #65
The state does that for a lot of people. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #67
"overselling prison life" ?? honest.abe Oct 2022 #68
I mean... Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #72
Beats homeless and living on the streets. I wouldnt be surprised if he got some Netfilx movie deal. honest.abe Oct 2022 #74
Okay but stop acting like prison life is so luxurious. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #75
Who said its luxurious?? honest.abe Oct 2022 #76
You seemed to imply it was. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #78
I did not. honest.abe Oct 2022 #79
He pleaded guilty. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #81
So no case have ever been overturned when a someone pleaded guilty? honest.abe Oct 2022 #83
Please stop conflating television drama for reality. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #86
Ok I simply disagree with you. honest.abe Oct 2022 #87
Anna Sorokin was paid $320,000 to adapt her life story of how she scammed the rich. honest.abe Oct 2022 #77
First of all, she's a financial scammer who served three years of a sentence. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #80
Its still a valid possibility and that's why the evil creep should be executed. honest.abe Oct 2022 #82
No. It's not valid. None of what you are claiming is valid. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #84
If it was your child slaughtered with bullet holes in their head would you feel the same way? honest.abe Oct 2022 #85
I honestly don't know. Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #88
There is no good outcome. twodogsbarking Oct 2022 #57
Should've been dead 3 years ago. We never properly punish terrorists. oldsoftie Oct 2022 #60
Agreed Owl Oct 2022 #90
Curious: what is the cost of keeping him in prison on a life sentence, vs. the cost of niyad Oct 2022 #62
Thank heavens they don't allow conjugal visits anymore bedazzled Oct 2022 #63
Three jurors spared him - NYT tonekat Oct 2022 #64
You do understand the concept of prison, don't you? nt Tommy Carcetti Oct 2022 #66
Good for the three who voted 'no'. Voltaire2 Oct 2022 #69
I frankly don't think the state or country need to be in the business of killing their citizens. BigDemVoter Oct 2022 #71
Awhile ago I came to the conclusion that I am opposed to the DP even in cases where I wish I wasn't XorXor Oct 2022 #73
As a note about this BumRushDaShow Oct 2022 #89
Good. The death Penalty is wrong in all instances. Gore1FL Oct 2022 #91
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATE: Florida jury spar...