Latest Breaking News

Botany

(77,266 posts)

1. From wiki Appointed by Donald Trump

Reply to Polybius (Original post)

Fri Oct 21, 2022, 12:00 PM

Oct 2022

n/t

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge blocks New York ban on guns in houses of worship [View all] Polybius Oct 2022 OP

From wiki Appointed by Donald Trump Botany Oct 2022 #1

Apparently, "sufficiently analogous regulations" means NONE. dchill Oct 2022 #2

"...serial numbers didn't exist in the founding era." dchill Oct 2022 #3

neither did azureblue Oct 2022 #10

Point. dchill Oct 2022 #12

Then people can carry THEM anywhere. MicaelS Oct 2022 #17

Well, I guess all those Christ on the Crucifix displays will soon be retrofitted with AR15s hlthe2b Oct 2022 #4

What could be incongruous than bringing no_hypocrisy Oct 2022 #5

"consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation." I dont remember that Mr. Sparkle Oct 2022 #6

which azureblue Oct 2022 #11

No, it doesn't. former9thward Oct 2022 #45

Wasn't it Trump who said the colonists "took over the airports" in the Revolutionary War? CTyankee Oct 2022 #50

That is why they pay the Federalist Society PlutosHeart Oct 2022 #35

Fine, let's be originalists then. Novara Oct 2022 #47

Oh ffs... cilla4progress Oct 2022 #7

and all the while azureblue Oct 2022 #8

"Well-regulated" has been interpreted as "well-equipped", maxsolomon Oct 2022 #13

Soon, gun possession will achieve perfect freedom. maxsolomon Oct 2022 #9

oh, no... I beg to differ... slightlv Oct 2022 #14

You can carry guns in the Utah Capitol. maxsolomon Oct 2022 #33

If gunz aren't allowed in the Supreme Court... dchill Oct 2022 #15

EXACTLY!! bluestarone Oct 2022 #16

Whew! That's a relief. bucolic_frolic Oct 2022 #18

The founders didn't consider serial numbers Warpy Oct 2022 #19

That wasn't the only reason it was added jmowreader Oct 2022 #34

True enough, but they knew within a few years that local militias wouldn't work Warpy Oct 2022 #36

If a 700lb Grizzly bear was charging me, I am pretty sure I would want a semi-auto.. EX500rider Oct 2022 #53

We're tpo far south for grizzlies Warpy Oct 2022 #56

Getting a kill shot with one bullet on a charging bear would be quite the accomplishment. EX500rider Oct 2022 #57

Yet that's how hunters have usually done it. Warpy Oct 2022 #58

Hunters usually aren't shooting at a charging bear, they usually stalk the bear MarineCombatEngineer Oct 2022 #59

Not talking about hunting bears EX500rider Oct 2022 #60

So then it's up to each church to ban them if they choose? old guy Oct 2022 #20

Apparently, yes. So its much ado about nothing. Just post a sign if you don't want it. oldsoftie Oct 2022 #28

So the judge wants to have dead citizens of various denominations in any house of worship? Ford_Prefect Oct 2022 #21

prohibited in the 1800's in some places anotherOKIE Oct 2022 #22

Churches can ban guns Kaleva Oct 2022 #31

What if the church posts a "no weapons" sign? Don't they have that right too? oldsoftie Oct 2022 #23

Yes. They have that right onenote Oct 2022 #27

What if congress were to pass a bill bluestarone Oct 2022 #41

It would be Constitutional. onenote Oct 2022 #42

JFC.. Karma13612 Oct 2022 #24

Go wrong? Traildogbob Oct 2022 #26

F**k these crazy judges and 'historical tradition'. Where were the AR-15s in 1787? sinkingfeeling Oct 2022 #25

Places of worship can ban the presence of guns on their premises Kaleva Oct 2022 #30

Wow most Federal Regulations are at risk IbogaProject Oct 2022 #29

From last month: "Judge's Ruling Maps Strategy for N.Y. Concealed-Carry Gun Cases" sl8 Oct 2022 #32

What could possibly go wrong? Initech Oct 2022 #37

What the hell is wrong with so many of these judges? demosincebirth Oct 2022 #38

Sanctuary? dlk Oct 2022 #39

Just another place for me not to go SouthernDem4ever Oct 2022 #40

Most Churches are private property madville Oct 2022 #43

Yep. The judge ruled correctly here NickB79 Oct 2022 #49

Ignore the judge. paleotn Oct 2022 #44

So under that scenario, MarineCombatEngineer Oct 2022 #55

What??! Rhiannon12866 Oct 2022 #46

Do you honestly think that a law prohibiting guns... Kaleva Oct 2022 #48

Mass shooters don't care about these laws madville Oct 2022 #51

Well then, maybe Thomas should move to block the ban on guns in The U.S. Supreme Court too. msfiddlestix Oct 2022 #52

The issue is larger than the 2A DVRacer Oct 2022 #54