Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

melm00se

(5,161 posts)
31. The problem is
Fri Nov 4, 2022, 03:38 PM
Nov 2022

that is he IS smart (not genius but above average smart).

But, he suffers from "not smart enough" syndrome.

This intellectual defect blinds him to the laws that he allegedly violated (the WARN Act). This syndrome also ensured that he did not consult with the people whose job it is to KNOW about laws like this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If you're so rich... GreenWave Nov 2022 #1
He's rich because of his father. intheflow Nov 2022 #12
The problem is melm00se Nov 2022 #31
The Board of Directors should have stood up and stopped this illegal mass firing. NCjack Nov 2022 #2
There's nothing illegal about a mass firing FBaggins Nov 2022 #4
A good board concerned about the corporation's image would have NCjack Nov 2022 #7
Assumes facts not in evidence FBaggins Nov 2022 #8
go read the notice twitter sent out to employees TomDaisy Nov 2022 #21
Where? FBaggins Nov 2022 #26
Musk fired the executives "For cause" (falsely) so he could get around paying them severance TomDaisy Nov 2022 #23
Errr... 60 days of a paycheck..... Happy Hoosier Nov 2022 #9
Yes. That's obvious FBaggins Nov 2022 #11
twitter's notice to employees said nothing about that TomDaisy Nov 2022 #22
It won't stop Musk from firing them. But it will make him liable to paying them damages pnwmom Nov 2022 #24
The lawsuit wouldn't do that FBaggins Nov 2022 #27
The WARN notice itself should have stated that. The reports I'm seeing pnwmom Nov 2022 #28
There isn't any indication that they didn't FBaggins Nov 2022 #29
It is illegal in California and other states...even Ohio. GM lost in court after closing Lordstown Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #37
Nope FBaggins Nov 2022 #40
You would have thought he would have hired a labor lawyer exboyfil Nov 2022 #6
I have an acquaintance who is the labor attorney for a mega-company NCjack Nov 2022 #14
Tough job exboyfil Nov 2022 #16
Ug...that sounds like a terrible job. C Moon Nov 2022 #30
Doesn't surprise me, in California ... aggiesal Nov 2022 #3
Musk has a plan - (Repeating my post from another thread) SpankMe Nov 2022 #5
You have a point exboyfil Nov 2022 #13
I wonder if he could move it to Saudi Arabia and skip US law bronxiteforever Nov 2022 #18
It's a Federal law, so the Federal govt would enforce it, not CA. n/t pnwmom Nov 2022 #25
The downfall will be from advertisers jumping ship like AUDI did today Bengus81 Nov 2022 #32
He moved Tesla to Texas and is facing lawsuits for that...who gives a shit? Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #38
LOL bucolic_frolic Nov 2022 #10
hopefully it's 100% smaller well before the 2024 election groundloop Nov 2022 #15
I can fire people on Fifth Avenue and it won't affect the number of Tweeters. twodogsbarking Nov 2022 #17
. Look Ma I'm suing Twitter. LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2022 #19
Running a company is hard work. yardwork Nov 2022 #20
Shouldn't matter if they're really being paid through February 2, 2023. Calista241 Nov 2022 #33
There is no severence. He is terminating for cause. And let me tell you, we are in mediation with Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #39
From what I've been hearing, SlimJimmy Nov 2022 #34
Is it a social media site if no one shows up? The Jungle 1 Nov 2022 #35
at least in wisconsin i was under the impression the law was more location oriented dembotoz Nov 2022 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Twitter sued over short-n...»Reply #31