Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

lalalu

(1,663 posts)

23. Once again you post an article about a Hispanic

Reply to lunamagica (Reply #19)

Sat Nov 10, 2012, 07:12 AM

Nov 2012

neighborhood as if that is one homogenous group. An article that also suggests that immigration is the only issue that matters to Hispanics because supposedly they are all here illegally. Seriously? That is your view of Hispanics.

But then again you link from Huffington Post and I am not surprised. Most of you don't even know that the founder was a big Reagan supporter that helped implement policies that destroyed this country and helped keep her ex hubby and his buddies rich. Only suckers believe that woman.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Immigration Reform Effort To Begin In Senate Post-Inauguration [View all] Adenoid_Hynkel Nov 2012 OP

Do it. I want PBO to be on the TV asking everyone to call their Congress critter to pass it. Vincardog Nov 2012 #1

It is still dicey. lalalu Nov 2012 #2

You can't place limits on the rights of naturalized US Citizens. Violates Equal Protection. leveymg Nov 2012 #3

LOL, I don't like "swarthy brown people"? lalalu Nov 2012 #4

Ok. Why then do you want to limit the ability of naturalized citizens to sponsor relatives? leveymg Nov 2012 #5

The Dream Act would be amnesty and can have limitations. lalalu Nov 2012 #6

Yes, on their initial legalized status. But, no limits can extend after people naturalize. leveymg Nov 2012 #7

The Dream Act would be an exception. lalalu Nov 2012 #8

Many immigrants are allowed to legalize their status with various waivers as it is. DREAM doesn't leveymg Nov 2012 #9

Wrong lalalu Nov 2012 #10

Most of this arguments fail to address the problem AlphaCentauri Nov 2012 #11

There is reality. lalalu Nov 2012 #12

and reality check AlphaCentauri Nov 2012 #20

You are checking nothing lalalu Nov 2012 #22

Did you even read the article? lunamagica Nov 2012 #13

Univision and Telemundo? lalalu Nov 2012 #14

I read your post. Looks like you didn't read the article lunamagica Nov 2012 #15

It isn't about what i think. lalalu Nov 2012 #16

No don't think it's OK. But it is what millions of Latinos watch lunamagica Nov 2012 #17

Again you should go back and read. lalalu Nov 2012 #18

Well, then, I guess Obama made a big mistake in not consulting you before spending so much money on lunamagica Nov 2012 #19

Once again you post an article about a Hispanic lalalu Nov 2012 #23

Seriously? My view of Hispanics comes from being one lunamagica Nov 2012 #24

Most Hispanics? lalalu Nov 2012 #25

"Amnesty is completely different from a path to citizenship." Comrade Grumpy Nov 2012 #29

Yes it is completely different. lalalu Nov 2012 #30

55% of repubs, 75% of Democrats but only 46% of teabaggers support a path to citizenship pampango Nov 2012 #21

I believe you've just outed that one. BlueCaliDem Nov 2012 #26

Reality will show you what the lalalu Nov 2012 #32

Amnesty and a path to citizenship are not the same. lalalu Nov 2012 #27

Wow, I just read this. Wonderful post! lunamagica Nov 2012 #28

Here is proof. lalalu Nov 2012 #31