Latest Breaking News

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)

23. Oh I don't think this is about what the President knew. I think

Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:17 PM

Nov 2012

this is about Pretaeus did. However, the President and his executive team have to evaluate the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley/Benghazi/CIA issue in the larger context of their other programs in the Middle East. What is likely to be jeopardized by pursuing this? Don't know/ But it is strange that Paula talks about CIA and military operations like she was hanging out with her besties.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

47 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] anobserver2 Nov 2012 OP

Because she is an occult Black-Ops Republican Sex agent? Berlum Nov 2012 #1

Actually I would question that even thugh I initially thought she fit underthematrix Nov 2012 #5

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #2

Could it be Willard sandyshoes17 Nov 2012 #16

Yep. Petraeus is going to jail. underthematrix Nov 2012 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #7

No--apparently she had no inside information. She was simply touting info she got from a fake story tblue37 Nov 2012 #39

I think you nailed it. ciking724 Nov 2012 #44

Well, the original story was NOT that the consulate or annex was being used as a prison. tblue37 Nov 2012 #46

Because Patreaus embedded her? JoePhilly Nov 2012 #4

Nah to that both underthematrix Nov 2012 #11

Embedded her... BVictor1 Nov 2012 #20

I think the way to say it would be .... "He ... emmmm ... bedded her." JoePhilly Nov 2012 #24

Embeddedness happens Mme. Defarge Nov 2012 #22

Could it have come from this? The date is October 24th 2012. Lint Head Nov 2012 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #12

She said it because its true? If so, it means a US consulate is a secret detention facility riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #8

See my reply #39 above. nt tblue37 Nov 2012 #41

I don't know but Senator Feinstein is asking the same question. DURHAM D Nov 2012 #9

Now the video has been removed completely - no longer just "private". bananas Nov 2012 #10

Wasted effort dipsydoodle Nov 2012 #15

Thanks. nt bananas Nov 2012 #19

People..it is great to blog about this stuff but........ Swede Atlanta Nov 2012 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #32

The thing I find troublesome about what we know thus far is justiceischeap Nov 2012 #17

It looks like she isn't "making stuff up" and doesn't have inside info. tblue37 Nov 2012 #42

Oh I don't think this is about what the President knew. I think underthematrix Nov 2012 #23

Yes, she was strangely casual in her now-infamous U. of Denver speech. Z_I_Peevey Nov 2012 #25

Yes - what/who authorizes her to speak for the CIA and the military? colorado_ufo Nov 2012 #29

Maybe revenge from a woman scorned? yardwork Nov 2012 #31

There are clips of her speaking when she seems to think she is his demhottie Nov 2012 #36

Agreed. janx Nov 2012 #26

we will find out what really happened Enrique Nov 2012 #38

All I know is that... Indi Guy Nov 2012 #18

I agree with your statement... AntiFascist Nov 2012 #47

Obama issued a Wellstone ruled Nov 2012 #21

Video still up here: dvhughes Nov 2012 #27

Maybe she's fucking multiple sources? Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #28

that was a pretty big development Enrique Nov 2012 #30

I hope that noboby gets 'suicided' for knowing too much in this story. olddad56 Nov 2012 #33

Maybe John2 Nov 2012 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author anobserver2 Nov 2012 #35

There is no chance that she was NOT sleeping w Petreaus demhottie Nov 2012 #37

Not the type??? DeSwiss Nov 2012 #45

K&R DeSwiss Nov 2012 #40

K^R ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #43