Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lonestarblue

(13,513 posts)
17. Republicans should just go ahead and declare full Taliban policies instead of their piecemeal
Wed Jan 11, 2023, 10:23 AM
Jan 2023

attempts to control everything women do. After all, why waste money on educating girls when they’ll only be allowed to be baby incubators. Why provide healthcare for women when men have declared that pregnancy is natural and no woman ever has complications requiring a doctor. Why have police and the courts involved in domestic abuse or rape when it’s any male’s right to “correct” his female relatives or to force sex on an unwilling woman. Forced marriage at 13 will take care of those unwed mothers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Commit Tax Fraud, Steal Classified Documents Or Incite An Insurrection Instead SoCalDavidS Jan 2023 #1
Of course, 'cause that's what they do in Alabama. elleng Jan 2023 #2
A new campaign gift to Dems. Treat it as such and begin NOW! nt Samrob Jan 2023 #3
The Human Life Protection Act ? YoshidaYui Jan 2023 #4
Unless they intercept mail, or other communications pfitz59 Jan 2023 #5
make it part of a random drug test or pulled over for dui? dembotoz Jan 2023 #16
There's no drug test for mif. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2023 #25
yet dembotoz Jan 2023 #29
Unlikely to be. It's metabolized very quickly. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2023 #30
But what are your thoughts about this. ancianita Jan 2023 #6
Huh? NT mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2023 #7
The OP is about prosecuting the women, not fed gov agencies, or pharma muriel_volestrangler Jan 2023 #15
Okay. I hear you. And I get that. But I'm thinking there is always more behind prosecuting women, ancianita Jan 2023 #22
If men are so smart they should figure out how to have the babies themselves and leave us alone Walleye Jan 2023 #8
I second the thought!! riversedge Jan 2023 #11
Or good Rebl2 Jan 2023 #20
That of course would be reasonable alternative, if possible Walleye Jan 2023 #21
Don't worry wolfie001 Jan 2023 #9
Men who take medications that inhibit sperm output should also be prosecuted by this law bucolic_frolic Jan 2023 #10
So the OTC med Rebl2 Jan 2023 #23
Guess the busybody party is going to have to create a whole new police force to follow Vinca Jan 2023 #12
"Chemical endangerment" - so pregnant women who drink alcohol or smoke will also be prosecuted. QED. TheRickles Jan 2023 #13
Or industries that spew out fumes and liquids that cause miscarriages and birth defects? ck4829 Jan 2023 #14
Dozens of people who used drugs while pregnant have faced criminal charges. It's likely to increase WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2023 #27
Republicans should just go ahead and declare full Taliban policies instead of their piecemeal Lonestarblue Jan 2023 #17
Why not just put all pregnant women in Maternity Camps until the 'product' is delivered? 70sEraVet Jan 2023 #18
So what if they step across the border and take the pills Farmer-Rick Jan 2023 #19
How did we get here? Marthe48 Jan 2023 #24
Like it or not we don't have equal rights. Hope22 Jan 2023 #26
Good luck with that, Mr. Marshall. Martin68 Jan 2023 #28
K&R Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2023 #31
Name one Doctor that ever proscribed Meth fumes. Grins Jan 2023 #32
Any state official that tries to enforce this should be arrested and charged Mysterian Jan 2023 #33
Don't ask don't tell gets a new use case? Brainfodder Jan 2023 #34
Prove it is all I can say... raising2moredems Jan 2023 #35
"Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall said Tuesday..." LudwigPastorius Jan 2023 #36
Time to go The Bopper Jan 2023 #37
Here's a thought Marthe48 Jan 2023 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Women can be prosecuted f...»Reply #17