Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

nuxvomica

(14,083 posts)

6. That tells us a lot

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2023, 01:03 PM

Jan 2023

Would established political hack Chertoff look the other way if his investigation pointed to a liberal justice or their clerks and assistants? Of course not. So either Chertoff just failed to find the leaker or did find the leaker and failed to report it for idealogical/cronyism reasons.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with expert brought in to review leak probe [View all] BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 OP

Gee, wonder why no one has any confidence in the SCOTUS any more? sinkingfeeling Jan 2023 #1

We ALL know the ONLY answer is bluestarone Jan 2023 #2

rich so and sos protecting rich so and sos. AllaN01Bear Jan 2023 #3

or they bought off Chertoff to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Thomas Hurt Jan 2023 #4

Never trusted that guy. 2naSalit Jan 2023 #5

No kidding. He made airport security his own personal KPN Jan 2023 #21

(For those who don't know about Chertoff & the scanners) NullTuples Jan 2023 #27

That tells us a lot nuxvomica Jan 2023 #6

Yup. Just like how Durham didn't follow up on Italy giving him info on Trump's crimes. SunSeeker Jan 2023 #33

More proof we have become a third world mess thanks to Republicans nt DURHAM D Jan 2023 #7

THIS. The wannabe Russias' and oligarchs are KPN Jan 2023 #23

Of course they didn't Marthe48 Jan 2023 #8

Secret Court Xoan Jan 2023 #9

The USA has its own official Star Chamber -- devoted to protecting MAGAt interests. NCjack Jan 2023 #12

Wait, Chertoff? LisaM Jan 2023 #10

"How was his name not part of the headlines?" BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #16

wasn't that slime ball involved in iran contra, getting us into iraq, etc? certainot Jan 2023 #18

Why even bother reporting on this? The fix was in from the start. Ray Bruns Jan 2023 #11

Credit: Everybody Knows by Leonard Cohen littlemissmartypants Jan 2023 #15

Ah, Leonard Cohen! Miss that guy. KPN Jan 2023 #24

The GOPers on the Court gave Chertoff $1 million Farmer-Rick Jan 2023 #13

Next time, hire the CyberNinjas! Mawspam2 Jan 2023 #14

So ... Michael Chertoff was paid to NOT find the leak. Have I got that right? FakeNoose Jan 2023 #17

Exactly. Bet he found out though, and that it's common knowledge... brush Jan 2023 #38

such bad faith. barbtries Jan 2023 #19

More aggravation for readers and: SayItLoud Jan 2023 #20

So who leaked this tidbit? CNN seems not to want to tell as well... Backseat Driver Jan 2023 #22

not surprising this court has no ethics. IMO republianmushroom Jan 2023 #25

Disclosed to whom? And independent how? FBaggins Jan 2023 #26

LOL. Yeah, you have a point. Everybody Knows the game is rigged and that's the way it goes.... msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #35

Is that impeachable? OneCrazyDiamond Jan 2023 #28

Ethics!? We don't need no stinking ethics!!! Scalded Nun Jan 2023 #29

Anyone see the pattern? Baitball Blogger Jan 2023 #30

And yet they ask why so few people trust the court's integrity??????? Oh My!!! Ford_Prefect Jan 2023 #31

No words Joinfortmill Jan 2023 #32

Sure would be great if there was something we could do about this level of corruption in SCOTUS msfiddlestix Jan 2023 #34

Kick ck4829 Jan 2023 #36

More SCOTUS corruption. brush Jan 2023 #37

The Supreme Court is corrupt and illegitimate Mysterian Jan 2023 #39