Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)White House aides have discussed Social Security tax, eyeing shortfall [View all]
Source: Washington Post
During an hour-long meeting in the Oval Office, before they went to film a video together about student debt, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) pitched President Biden on his vision for hammering the Republican Party over one of the most potent issues in American politics.
Biden has for weeks leaned into the simple message that he is determined to block GOP efforts to cut Social Security and Medicare for millions of seniors. Left unanswered in these attacks is what Biden, himself, wants to do to address the massive funding shortfalls facing the programs, which face catastrophic benefit reductions within a decade if lawmakers take no action.
In that Jan. 25 meeting, Sanders pushed the president to fully fund Social Security for more than seven decades by expanding payroll taxes on affluent Americans, rather than just on workers first $160,000 in earnings, as is the case under current law. Sanders also asked the president to back his proposal highly unlikely to pass Congress to not only defend existing benefits but also increase them. He wants to provide another $2,400 per year for every Social Security beneficiary.
This previously unreported discussion between Biden and his onetime presidential primary rival reflects a broader behind-the-scenes effort inside the White House to decide how, or if, the partys message on entitlements should go beyond criticizing the GOP. Biden aides have in recent weeks discussed proposing raising payroll taxes on the rich to fund Social Security, but it is unclear if the president will ultimately endorse that measure when he releases his budget in March, according to three people familiar with international deliberations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private talks. One of those people cautioned the talks were preliminary and it is still likely the White House opts not to advance the plan.
Biden has for weeks leaned into the simple message that he is determined to block GOP efforts to cut Social Security and Medicare for millions of seniors. Left unanswered in these attacks is what Biden, himself, wants to do to address the massive funding shortfalls facing the programs, which face catastrophic benefit reductions within a decade if lawmakers take no action.
In that Jan. 25 meeting, Sanders pushed the president to fully fund Social Security for more than seven decades by expanding payroll taxes on affluent Americans, rather than just on workers first $160,000 in earnings, as is the case under current law. Sanders also asked the president to back his proposal highly unlikely to pass Congress to not only defend existing benefits but also increase them. He wants to provide another $2,400 per year for every Social Security beneficiary.
This previously unreported discussion between Biden and his onetime presidential primary rival reflects a broader behind-the-scenes effort inside the White House to decide how, or if, the partys message on entitlements should go beyond criticizing the GOP. Biden aides have in recent weeks discussed proposing raising payroll taxes on the rich to fund Social Security, but it is unclear if the president will ultimately endorse that measure when he releases his budget in March, according to three people familiar with international deliberations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private talks. One of those people cautioned the talks were preliminary and it is still likely the White House opts not to advance the plan.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2023/02/23/biden-white-house-social-security/
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House aides have discussed Social Security tax, eyeing shortfall [View all]
brooklynite
Feb 2023
OP
The reason those who opt out are still represented is due to exclusive representation clauses
MichMan
Feb 2023
#33
Yeah, they claim to allow unions, until you actually really read the legislation
Farmer-Rick
Feb 2023
#38
If the unions eliminated the exclusive representation clauses of their contracts...
MichMan
Feb 2023
#42
Maybe: the 790,000 age 65+ deaths with Covid represent 1.5% of the age 65+ population
progree
Feb 2023
#10
Can Social Security be changed where all types of income must pay into it?
friend of a friend
Feb 2023
#9