Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(131,231 posts)

3. Here's the order where the judge explains the decision:

Thu Mar 9, 2023, 05:39 PM

Mar 2023

https://statesuniteddemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2304-OPINION-APPROVING-STIPULATION-TO-DISCIPLINE-UNDER-C.R.C.P.-242.19c....pdf Basically, it was because they couldn't find any precedential cases like this one, and the misstatements were not made in her capacity as an attorney of record. It's a long, interesting analysis.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A whole $224? Warpy Mar 2023 #1

Gee, a censure.... Karadeniz Mar 2023 #2

Here's the order where the judge explains the decision: Ocelot II Mar 2023 #3

Marc Elias is amused LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2023 #4

$224. That's kind of begging her to do it again, only bigger. Scrivener7 Mar 2023 #6

Deep deep deep is the G.O.P. doo doo Achilleaze Mar 2023 #7

more slaps on the wrist. republianmushroom Mar 2023 #8

Locking Emile Mar 2023 #9