Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Petraeus Scandal: Paula Broadwell in Classified Document Probe [View all]Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)32. It depends on what the documents were
I know that with top secret clearance it doesn't mean you can see everything, you still have to have a valid "need to know".
And like my son told me last night "need-to-know doesn't include 'because I want to" as a need.... I tried that ~grin~"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republican Party says they are, um, they are...they are going to go AWOL on this.
Berlum
Nov 2012
#12
How& why did she get into a secure government building in the first place? n/t
Little Star
Nov 2012
#6
A whistleblower would have been arrested and her house torn apart. Lover boy's, too.
leveymg
Nov 2012
#7
My suspicion meter went up when it was reported she did not even write the book.
dixiegrrrrl
Nov 2012
#9
Contrary to official Federal Law enforcement statements such as no laws broken is in itself a code.
gordianot
Nov 2012
#14