Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DOJ Told Court to Expect a Deluge of New Jan. 6 Prosecutions [View all]Scrivener7
(60,039 posts)30. So you believe the defining criterium for deciding who is prosecuted first is
ease of prosecution, then?
And it has nothing to do with "flipping" the inbred Magas who car-pooled to the Capitol from their home swamps on the assumption that "flipping" those people will lead up some pyramid to the organizers? As people here have ridiculously asserted for two years?
Well, THAT is something you and I can agree on.
Where we disagree is that I feel they should have used equal resources from the start to go after the organizers as they used going after the Magas who were told "it will be wild" and showed up for the party.
I still feel that way. Your mileage, apparently, varies. Jack Smith, apparently, is going after those organizers, but much time has been wasted.
And yes, I know, you disagree.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh, good. Because that is working so well to bring the organizers to justice.
Scrivener7
Mar 2023
#3
So you believe the defining criterium for deciding who is prosecuted first is
Scrivener7
Mar 2023
#30
Oh, dear! How sad! And you sound like such a friendly, warm, kind person! But I suppose
Scrivener7
Mar 2023
#53
Sure I saw the word "could", and that was way after you missed the word "did".
Beastly Boy
Mar 2023
#39
"...why it has taken Merrick Garland these some 800 days to charge trump for the attempted coup..."
republianmushroom
Mar 2023
#45
"Delusionals" always produce further delusions, no matter where they reside...
MayReasonRule
Mar 2023
#32
The Beer Hall Putsch did not thwart Hitler. Instead it solidified his power.
Scrivener7
Mar 2023
#31
All I want for my 76 birthday in 11 days. Is to hear that the treasonous FORMER POTUS is.....
usaf-vet
Mar 2023
#14
I toss my hat in. My 7-0 BD is in 5 days 34 mins. An indictment of (former)President Donald J Trump.
electric_blue68
Mar 2023
#15
A thousand MAGAts a year on the wall, a thousand MAGAts a year ..........
bucolic_frolic
Mar 2023
#22
The DOJ is giving a heads up to the new chief judge of the DC court, James E. Boasberg.
ancianita
Mar 2023
#29