Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,063 posts)
7. But as a somewhat related note, I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome will mirror this -
Fri Mar 17, 2023, 11:57 AM
Mar 2023
Supreme Court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump

By Ariane de Vogue and Devan Cole, CNN
Updated 9:14 PM EST, Mon January 25, 2021



Washington CNN — The Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a case concerning whether former President Donald Trump violated provisions of the Constitution that bar a president from profiting from a foreign government.

The court instructed the lower courts to wipe away previous lower court opinions that went against Trump because he is no longer in office. It leaves unresolved a novel question raised in the case because Trump, unlike other presidents, did not use a blind trust when he assumed the presidency, but instead continued to retain an interest in his businesses and let those businesses take money from foreign and domestic governments. The order was issued without comment or dissent.

There were two cases covering the issue before the justices. One was initiated by lawyers for Maryland and Washington, DC, who argued Trump violated the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign and domestic governments through the Trump International Hotel in DC. They said they were disadvantaged in competing for business from foreign and state officials who may choose to do business with entities in which the President had a financial interest in order to curry favor.

A second case was brought by various members of the hospitality industry who own or work in hotels or restaurants in New York and Washington, who also argued they were put at a competitive disadvantage.

(snip)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/25/politics/emoluments-supreme-court-donald-trump-case/index.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why were the children and spouses even receiving gifts? LiberalFighter Mar 2023 #1
Perhaps TFG gave the Saudis a list of the persons and the gifts (or value) NCjack Mar 2023 #4
Ok, but any news on the Hunter case? Chakaconcarne Mar 2023 #2
Let's check THE ORB shall we? underpants Mar 2023 #6
And the orb says... Harker Mar 2023 #8
Playing with the Audi king's balls Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2023 #15
and the motherfucking GOP is investigating Hunter Biden's underwear. Novara Mar 2023 #3
+100 Rhiannon12866 Mar 2023 #18
Grifters gonna grift. ZonkerHarris Mar 2023 #5
But as a somewhat related note, I wouldn't be surprised if the outcome will mirror this - BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #7
I had forgotten about that. damn the SC!! riversedge Mar 2023 #10
I know BumRushDaShow Mar 2023 #11
Don't forget the "gift" of Chinese patents. Midnight Writer Mar 2023 #9
Gee I'm so surprised ... NOT! SouthernDem4ever Mar 2023 #12
"Mine, mine, all mine." What is he, 2 years old? Hekate Mar 2023 #13
People just give him so many things it is impossible to keep track. twodogsbarking Mar 2023 #14
I expected the number to be higher. BigmanPigman Mar 2023 #16
another crime ? republianmushroom Mar 2023 #17
Crucially, two gifts received by Trump and his family from foreign nations *ARE MISSING* LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2023 #19
A bigger than life size painting of TFG.. Permanut Mar 2023 #20
protocol. gifts are us govt property. pansypoo53219 Mar 2023 #21
Who would take home a life-sized portrait of Trump? LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2023 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump and his family fail...»Reply #7