Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(13,078 posts)
7. Yup, they sure were serious about meeting the 2% target
Wed Apr 12, 2023, 12:02 AM
Apr 2023

Last edited Wed Apr 12, 2023, 03:05 AM - Edit history (1)

Below is a graph of the Federal Reserve's target interest rate and the CPI from 4/1998 to 12/2001


# CPI: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0
(In "More Formatting Options" at the upper right one can change/add 2 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 12 month rolling averages, as well as show the 1 month changes. All with graphs.

# Fed Funds Target Rate (until 2008) -- https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFEDTAR
  (Context: it spent most of late 94 to late fall 98 at above 5%),

Per the NBER, the recession began March 2001.

I suspect likewise that nowadays the Fed is serious about the 2% target, but mindful of not crashing the banks. Core PCE is well over 4% on a rolling averages basis. https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143053501#post5

I'm frankly surprised that so many think the Fed is going to let inflation sit at more than twice their target rate, and that the 2% target is just for shits and giggles.

A 3.5% inflation rate (the peak plateau level shown in the above graph) may not be red-hot, but it's enough to cut the purchasing power of the dollar in half in about 20 years, and down to a quarter in 40 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IMF cuts GDP forecasts, s...»Reply #7