Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomSlick

(13,044 posts)
31. My point is the testimony of a plaintiff IS real evidence.
Fri Apr 21, 2023, 08:35 PM
Apr 2023

If Trump does not testify, there will be no "dueling assertions." If Trump does not appear and deny the allegations, the jury is free to believe the allegations of the plaintiff if they find her credible. The jury is also free to find the plaintiff is not credible. However, without Trump's testimony, the jury is not able to weigh which testimony they find the most credible.

Assuming Trump does not testify, if I was in the jury room, my first question would be whether I found by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) that the Plaintiff is credible. If I found the Plaintiff is credible, the only remaining question would be the amount of her damages.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lol Faux pas Apr 2023 #1
The first time... 2naSalit Apr 2023 #2
Ah, Tanya Harding - a blast from the past. Now reincarnated as Margarine Toilet Green. erronis Apr 2023 #6
At least she could do that. 2naSalit Apr 2023 #12
Tapioca COL Mustard Apr 2023 #8
It's 2naSalit Apr 2023 #13
Clearly not! COL Mustard Apr 2023 #15
I knew you'd understand. 2naSalit Apr 2023 #18
First time I've seen Mango Mussolini show consideration... IggleDuer Apr 2023 #3
Not really Novara Apr 2023 #4
He doesn't need an excuse not to be there. He's not required. soldierant Apr 2023 #10
This ZonkerHarris Apr 2023 #26
A few points. TomSlick Apr 2023 #5
Thank you Leith Apr 2023 #7
This! And I am So very grateful to the DU experts (legal and in the kitchen!) fierywoman Apr 2023 #9
she said/he said? pirsquared Apr 2023 #19
If the jury concludes Ms. Carroll is telling the truth, TomSlick Apr 2023 #20
If trump loses, he will appeal pirsquared Apr 2023 #23
That will not be how the smart money bets. TomSlick Apr 2023 #24
trump always denies an accusation--wouldn't every defendant? pirsquared Apr 2023 #30
My point is the testimony of a plaintiff IS real evidence. TomSlick Apr 2023 #31
trump defense team pirsquared Apr 2023 #32
Decisions are made by the people who show up Leith Apr 2023 #21
Your judgment of the case is premature PJMcK Apr 2023 #28
How could we know that ? mahina Apr 2023 #29
That Joe Tacopina is almost as sharp as anybody else. dchill Apr 2023 #11
Perhaps even duller than his client? Wow! erronis Apr 2023 #14
The court's response is something like... jmowreader Apr 2023 #16
But it was a beautiful excuse! A perfect excuse! tanyev Apr 2023 #17
DUzy Laura PourMeADrink Apr 2023 #27
This stunt by Trump will go over like a rotten egg in the Florida sun with Judge Kaplan... LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2023 #22
I am not initially against TFG's initial failure to appear at these trials, DemocraticPatriot Apr 2023 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge refuses to tell jur...»Reply #31