Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,302 posts)
3. I don't know if any of them read the full report yet
Fri Apr 28, 2023, 01:58 PM
Apr 2023

The article did regurgitate this -

Senior Fed officials said changes to the Dodd-Frank reforms helped spur the crisis, though they also acknowledge that the SVB case also was a failure of supervision. A change approved in 2018 reduced the stringency of stress testing for banks with less than $250 billion, a category in which SVB fell.

“We need to develop a culture that empowers supervisors to act in the face of uncertainty,” Barr wrote. “In the case of SVB, supervisors delayed action to gather more evidence even as weaknesses were clear and growing. This meant that supervisors did not force SVB to fix its problems, even as those problems worsened.”


The summary is here - https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/bcreg20230428a.htm

The report is here (PDF - it's 118 pages) - https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/svb-review-20230428.pdf

Per the CNBC article, GAO (Government Accountability Office) also issued a report on the same subject - https://www.gao.gov/blog/march-2023-bank-failures-risky-business-strategies-raise-questions-about-federal-oversight

GAO Summary - https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106736

GAO full Preliminary Review report (PDF - 46 pages) - https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-23-106736.pdf

(sorry to dump that on you )

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fed report on SVB collaps...»Reply #3