Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access [View all]forgotmylogin
(7,945 posts)40. The MAGA gun humpers on Twitter are all just replying "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"
But that's how you change an amendment - with another amendment. That's how women got the right to vote, alcohol was banned then reinstated, slavery was abolished, the Electoral College set up.
Repubs are no strangers to the idea of repealing or adjusting other amendments...
Amendment 14:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access [View all]
SpankMe
Jun 2023
OP
That's Correct Y'all Time Takes Time - If You Never Begin It Never Happens
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#2
The Governor of California doesn't have a role in Constitutional Amendments...
brooklynite
Jun 2023
#28
That's Right, Persuasive Speech Is A Core Component Of Any Second Order Societal Change
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#33
You're saying nobody has previously called for a CA to address gun control?
brooklynite
Jun 2023
#37
I'm just saying there hasn't been any traction for the obvious constitutional discussion
ColinC
Jun 2023
#48
Agree. Gov Newsom's got gutz. Can't believe he was once married to that cray cray woman now w Don Jr
onetexan
Jun 2023
#9
I think the gun lobby in this country is getting fewer and fewer members OR supporters...
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#10
Well, yes, if you assume that the Supremes who favor gun control haven't already learned what you
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#20
I understand your argument and it makes sense. However, not all of our gun problems in society are
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#42
The MAGA gun humpers on Twitter are all just replying "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"
forgotmylogin
Jun 2023
#40
Endorse / Add Your Name: Support a 28th Amendment to the Constitution on Guns:
TeamProg
Jun 2023
#17
It'll never happen. It's a waste of time. To those who say "I point you to Roe vs. Wade"...
FBaggins
Jun 2023
#39
Can't Never Could - Second Order Change Is An Incremental Journey That Begins With The First Step
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#41
and a Constitutional Convention declaration is equally difficult. Realistically, very unlikely to
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#46
Do they have the votes in Congress or through the states now? Unlikely. Unless the 2024
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#45
There is nothing a governor can do. I appreciate the sentiment but one could just as easily
Demsrule86
Jun 2023
#52
You still have to have a vote at the end...and a convention requires a certain number of states.
Demsrule86
Jun 2023
#54
