Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,862 posts)
67. The NYT has it as well (in their "Live Updates" )
Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:44 AM
Jun 2023
June 9, 2023, 10:19 a.m. ET23 minutes ago
23 minutes ago

Alan Feuer, William K. Rashbaum and Maggie Haberman
Trump case will be handled initially by judge who earlier made rulings in his favor.


Former President Donald J. Trump’s criminal indictment on charges stemming from his handling of classified documents will be overseen — at least initially — by a federal judge who a higher court criticized for handing him a series of unusually favorable rulings during the early stages of the investigation, according to five people familiar with the matter.

The judge, Aileen M. Cannon, who Mr. Trump himself appointed to the bench in 2020, his final year in office, is scheduled, at least for now, to preside over the former president’s first appearance in Federal District Court in Miami on Tuesday, the people said. But it was not clear whether Judge Cannon would remain assigned for the entirety of Mr. Trump’s case. Judge Cannon’s involvement was earlier reported by ABC News. While judges are typically given cases by a random process, it is also customary to hand incoming matters to judges who have dealt with related ones.

(snip)

Ruling for Mr. Trump, Judge Cannon effectively froze a significant portion of the government’s inquiry, barring prosecutors from using the materials seized from Mar-a-Lago for any “investigative purpose” connected to the case against Mr. Trump until the work of the arbiter, known as a special master, was finished.

An appeals court sitting in Atlanta ultimately overruled Judge Cannon, scrapped the special master’s review and allowed the investigation of Mr. Trump to resume unhindered. In a sharply critical decision, a three-member panel of the appeals court said Judge Cannon never had the proper jurisdiction to intervene in the case and order the review. The court also chided her for stopping federal investigators from using the files seized from Mar-a-Lago, saying there was no justification for treating Mr. Trump differently from any other target of a search warrant.

(snip)

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/06/09/us/trump-indictment-documents/aileen-cannon-trump-judge?smid=url-share

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, fuuuuuuuuuuck! Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #1
Straight out of the third world peppertree Jun 2023 #50
So much for the rule of law ... nt Jarqui Jun 2023 #68
Nah. LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #129
+1000 Rebl2 Jun 2023 #77
She's basically incompetent. Captain Zero Jun 2023 #94
JFC!!!!! RandySF Jun 2023 #2
Hell no. But she got overruled before, so she'll get overruled again if there is more funny emulatorloo Jun 2023 #3
Wow! The SECOND post is a rational, informed response. Hortensis Jun 2023 #109
Wtf... shouldn't she be asked to recuse herself Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #4
Based on what? getagrip_already Jun 2023 #15
The fact that she's biased toward trump Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #22
Why isn't being hired by the accused considered to be grounds for recusal? TheRickles Jun 2023 #37
I'm NOT arguing she is not a biased pos who should never be a judge again...... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #53
Apparently these cases are assigned randomly. it's just dumb luck she got it LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #57
except in this case it's one that had a judge in the circuit assned previously.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #59
Oh, it was totally random ArkansasDemocrat1 Jun 2023 #92
Even if he's convicted, I'll say right now he gets probation. oldsoftie Jun 2023 #97
Way too much coincidence to just be bad luck for DOJ. wnylib Jun 2023 #102
Absolutely! Rebl2 Jun 2023 #78
That makes no sense. She's not assigned to the division where the trial is to be held, Ocelot II Jun 2023 #5
I so hope you're right. But how sad that a source like ABC would make that statement, then. Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #7
That's what I heard last night... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #9
I heard that discussion last night too BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #23
NPR is reporting it as established fact. wnylib Jun 2023 #104
And I thought he was going to charged in d.c. Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #10
Not on the documents charges. The proper venue is FL. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #13
They mentioned something about the Special Master on MSNBC. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #16
Judge AMC GenXer47 Jun 2023 #25
I thought it was great and probably required for the obstruction part that it was filed in FL Cheezoholic Jun 2023 #30
According to Beau of the 5th column these federal courts have a 95+% conviction rate PortTack Jun 2023 #80
Everyone gave me so much crap yesterday for saying this would happen Marius25 Jun 2023 #31
The skeptics are skeptical about skeptics. KPN Jun 2023 #48
she is in the district circuit, so is eligible to be assigned.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #64
Umm... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #6
"We" can't demand it. And we don't know if this is even true. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #11
On second thought... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #18
Actually, this case is related to the case she heard regarding the search warrant onenote Jun 2023 #41
That makes sense. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #44
NPR is usually cautious about what it reports. wnylib Jun 2023 #105
Holy fucking shit - this is my very worst nightmare. lark Jun 2023 #8
Hopefully, the Prosecution anticipated this! Deuce Jun 2023 #12
I'm sure they anticipated just about everything and will deal with it. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #17
Yes, I think this team has and will... Deuce Jun 2023 #21
Oh no doubt! Mr Smith would not be outsmarted by a rinky dink tin pot judge like her PortTack Jun 2023 #81
utter, ridiculous bulkshit - let's see the process that leads to this fuckery bringthePaine Jun 2023 #14
Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors were prepared for this... agingdem Jun 2023 #19
Agree... Deuce Jun 2023 #24
Jack Smith is not the guy she can fuck with.. agingdem Jun 2023 #27
She could dismiss the charges if she really wanted to Marius25 Jun 2023 #32
You can bet Smith is ready for this... agingdem Jun 2023 #34
They can't really do anything to stop her other than appeal bad decisions Marius25 Jun 2023 #35
yes..and remember agingdem Jun 2023 #38
I'm not sure an appeal can stop her from just dismissing the case Marius25 Jun 2023 #39
the sky is not falling... agingdem Jun 2023 #52
I can't imagine such an action could not be reversed Major Nikon Jun 2023 #69
How so? She has the job for life and Republicans won't impeach her Marius25 Jun 2023 #70
I seriously doubt if it will ever get that far Major Nikon Jun 2023 #114
Nonsense Mysterian Jun 2023 #79
See post #82 PortTack Jun 2023 #83
This video explains it pretty well. MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #116
With these federal courts..I don't think so. Mr smith did not bring these charges lightly PortTack Jun 2023 #82
She can't be removed from the bench Marius25 Jun 2023 #84
Glenn Kirschner talking about this MontanaMama Jun 2023 #20
So, for those who weren't tuning in, can you share the nutshell take-away from what he said? KPN Jun 2023 #45
he basically said it cannot stand but didn't offer much more concrete than that LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #54
Thanks LL! KPN Jun 2023 #60
So in other words, he's not in the least bit concerned PortTack Jun 2023 #85
Wow. Serious misfire there. At least it will be interesting. ananda Jun 2023 #26
Surprise!!! SledDriver Jun 2023 #28
No kidding. The past 7 years has been one long tease ... how on earth could we alexpect that to end KPN Jun 2023 #51
If there is a decent bone in her body she will recuse herself. I hate that any president appoints Autumn Jun 2023 #29
She's based in Fort Pierce, over 100 miles north of Miami. Tommy Carcetti Jun 2023 #33
I suspect that it is because this case is related to the search warrant that was the subject onenote Jun 2023 #40
That's what was mentioned later in the ABC article BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #42
ABC mentioned later in speculative article because click booth worthiness would be diminished. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #61
The NYT has it as well (in their "Live Updates" ) BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #67
Thx for posting..this pretty much slams the door shut for any funny business on her part PortTack Jun 2023 #87
There is a post in this thread with a mini tweet-thread explanation by Joyce (Alene) Vance BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #90
I heard that same explanation from, I can't remember who... SKKY Jun 2023 #62
The criminality never ends. Kablooie Jun 2023 #36
If she pulls Traildogbob Jun 2023 #49
a prosecutor can't appeal a finding of not guilty if it comes to that.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #66
😡😡🤬🤬 Traildogbob Jun 2023 #71
If one juror fails to vote for conviction, it will be a hung jury. wnylib Jun 2023 #106
Could this be an effort by Merrick Garland to show the indictments are not politically motivated? LaMouffette Jun 2023 #43
Oh, FFS. Merrick has no authority to assign judges to cases. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #46
Thanks. I didn't know that. LaMouffette Jun 2023 #55
I thought this was on Onion piece. PlutosHeart Jun 2023 #47
Hopefully ONLY initially. And remember she was overruled several times by higher courts LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #56
Not just overruled, judicial spanking leaving marks! Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #63
Haha! True! LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #73
Huh? How? Lulu KC Jun 2023 #58
You can be sure moniss Jun 2023 #65
In a state where it's legal to run into protesters Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #75
WHY. With 26 district judges in the FL southern district, why should SHE be allowed to continue her ancianita Jun 2023 #72
cases are assigned randomly by a rotating wheel LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #74
A serious question deserves a serious answer. ancianita Jun 2023 #95
I was being serious. That's what I heard. Although I heard someone else say that it could have gone LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #98
Sure you were, because you know it for a fact. And now you 'heard someone else say..." ancianita Jun 2023 #101
Joyce White Vance on this story LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #76
"...Judge Cannon must step aside if the case falls to her" Hortensis Jun 2023 #107
DOJ won't seek her removal for bias and the 11th Circuit wouldn't order it anyway. onenote Jun 2023 #118
Maybe. She found it persuasive, but like us she won't be Hortensis Jun 2023 #119
Michael Popok, from Meidas Touch Network, has said that Zilli Jun 2023 #86
And what makes Popok an expert? Marius25 Jun 2023 #89
Jack Smith and the DOJ knew this was possible/probable. SayItLoud Jun 2023 #88
45 has not done well with appointees so far, including the Surpreme Court. He's batting something .. marble falls Jun 2023 #91
You have to hope, Bayard Jun 2023 #93
One would think. Novara Jun 2023 #100
Depends on why Trump appointed her and what wnylib Jun 2023 #108
That was quick. orangecrush Jun 2023 #96
Folks, calm down. If true, this is JUST the arraignment, not the whole case. Novara Jun 2023 #99
When buttface is convicted, no one can claim she's a liberal judge serving Biden or the deep state.. Chakaconcarne Jun 2023 #103
No, but she could just give him probation instead of real jail time Marius25 Jun 2023 #126
He'll walk. Turbineguy Jun 2023 #110
As a taxpayer for the federal court syste I think We the People can demand that she be removed..... turbinetree Jun 2023 #111
I'm sorry, as a taxpayer, slightlv Jun 2023 #113
I see Merrick Garland's fingerprints all over this. He has been trying to slow this process since Handler Jun 2023 #112
I think you forgot the sarcasm smilie. onenote Jun 2023 #123
Justice must IMMEDIATELY file a request to change judges. lark Jun 2023 #115
You can take it to the bank that DOJ will not seek to have her removed on bias grounds. onenote Jun 2023 #117
That means things could get ugly depending on what she does Marius25 Jun 2023 #125
"That means Trump will likely get away with this" LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #128
So the oligarchs have ruled for our death as a country! The sky is not Blue they say. lark Jun 2023 #131
Well said Handler Jun 2023 #120
Thank you lark Jun 2023 #130
"1/Before everyone gets too spun up about reports Judge Cannon" Cha Jun 2023 #121
The case she cites is not authority for reassigning Cannon onenote Jun 2023 #122
Of course she possesses no ethics and won't recuse herself SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #124
Asking for a friend ... jgo Jun 2023 #127
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge Aileen Cannon, a Tr...»Reply #67