Latest Breaking News

Traildogbob

(13,024 posts)

71. 😡😡🤬🤬

Reply to getagrip_already (Reply #66)

Fri Jun 9, 2023, 10:53 AM

Jun 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

131 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, initially assigned to oversee his case: Sources [View all] BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 OP

Oh, fuuuuuuuuuuck! Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #1

Straight out of the third world peppertree Jun 2023 #50

So much for the rule of law ... nt Jarqui Jun 2023 #68

Nah. LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #129

+1000 Rebl2 Jun 2023 #77

She's basically incompetent. Captain Zero Jun 2023 #94

JFC!!!!! RandySF Jun 2023 #2

Hell no. But she got overruled before, so she'll get overruled again if there is more funny emulatorloo Jun 2023 #3

Wow! The SECOND post is a rational, informed response. Hortensis Jun 2023 #109

Wtf... shouldn't she be asked to recuse herself Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #4

Based on what? getagrip_already Jun 2023 #15

The fact that she's biased toward trump Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #22

Why isn't being hired by the accused considered to be grounds for recusal? TheRickles Jun 2023 #37

I'm NOT arguing she is not a biased pos who should never be a judge again...... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #53

Apparently these cases are assigned randomly. it's just dumb luck she got it LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #57

except in this case it's one that had a judge in the circuit assned previously.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #59

Oh, it was totally random ArkansasDemocrat1 Jun 2023 #92

Even if he's convicted, I'll say right now he gets probation. oldsoftie Jun 2023 #97

Way too much coincidence to just be bad luck for DOJ. wnylib Jun 2023 #102

Absolutely! Rebl2 Jun 2023 #78

That makes no sense. She's not assigned to the division where the trial is to be held, Ocelot II Jun 2023 #5

I so hope you're right. But how sad that a source like ABC would make that statement, then. Scrivener7 Jun 2023 #7

That's what I heard last night... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #9

I heard that discussion last night too BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #23

NPR is reporting it as established fact. wnylib Jun 2023 #104

And I thought he was going to charged in d.c. Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #10

Not on the documents charges. The proper venue is FL. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #13

They mentioned something about the Special Master on MSNBC. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #16

Judge AMC GenXer47 Jun 2023 #25

I thought it was great and probably required for the obstruction part that it was filed in FL Cheezoholic Jun 2023 #30

According to Beau of the 5th column these federal courts have a 95+% conviction rate PortTack Jun 2023 #80

Everyone gave me so much crap yesterday for saying this would happen Marius25 Jun 2023 #31

The skeptics are skeptical about skeptics. KPN Jun 2023 #48

she is in the district circuit, so is eligible to be assigned.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #64

Umm... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #6

"We" can't demand it. And we don't know if this is even true. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #11

On second thought... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #18

Actually, this case is related to the case she heard regarding the search warrant onenote Jun 2023 #41

That makes sense. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #44

NPR is usually cautious about what it reports. wnylib Jun 2023 #105

Holy fucking shit - this is my very worst nightmare. lark Jun 2023 #8

Hopefully, the Prosecution anticipated this! Deuce Jun 2023 #12

I'm sure they anticipated just about everything and will deal with it. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #17

Yes, I think this team has and will... Deuce Jun 2023 #21

Oh no doubt! Mr Smith would not be outsmarted by a rinky dink tin pot judge like her PortTack Jun 2023 #81

utter, ridiculous bulkshit - let's see the process that leads to this fuckery bringthePaine Jun 2023 #14

Jack Smith and his team of prosecutors were prepared for this... agingdem Jun 2023 #19

Agree... Deuce Jun 2023 #24

Jack Smith is not the guy she can fuck with.. agingdem Jun 2023 #27

She could dismiss the charges if she really wanted to Marius25 Jun 2023 #32

You can bet Smith is ready for this... agingdem Jun 2023 #34

They can't really do anything to stop her other than appeal bad decisions Marius25 Jun 2023 #35

yes..and remember agingdem Jun 2023 #38

I'm not sure an appeal can stop her from just dismissing the case Marius25 Jun 2023 #39

the sky is not falling... agingdem Jun 2023 #52

I can't imagine such an action could not be reversed Major Nikon Jun 2023 #69

How so? She has the job for life and Republicans won't impeach her Marius25 Jun 2023 #70

I seriously doubt if it will ever get that far Major Nikon Jun 2023 #114

Nonsense Mysterian Jun 2023 #79

See post #82 PortTack Jun 2023 #83

This video explains it pretty well. MarineCombatEngineer Jun 2023 #116

With these federal courts..I don't think so. Mr smith did not bring these charges lightly PortTack Jun 2023 #82

She can't be removed from the bench Marius25 Jun 2023 #84

Glenn Kirschner talking about this MontanaMama Jun 2023 #20

So, for those who weren't tuning in, can you share the nutshell take-away from what he said? KPN Jun 2023 #45

he basically said it cannot stand but didn't offer much more concrete than that LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #54

Thanks LL! KPN Jun 2023 #60

So in other words, he's not in the least bit concerned PortTack Jun 2023 #85

Wow. Serious misfire there. At least it will be interesting. ananda Jun 2023 #26

Surprise!!! SledDriver Jun 2023 #28

No kidding. The past 7 years has been one long tease ... how on earth could we alexpect that to end KPN Jun 2023 #51

If there is a decent bone in her body she will recuse herself. I hate that any president appoints Autumn Jun 2023 #29

She's based in Fort Pierce, over 100 miles north of Miami. Tommy Carcetti Jun 2023 #33

I suspect that it is because this case is related to the search warrant that was the subject onenote Jun 2023 #40

That's what was mentioned later in the ABC article BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #42

ABC mentioned later in speculative article because click booth worthiness would be diminished. Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #61

The NYT has it as well (in their "Live Updates" ) BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #67

Thx for posting..this pretty much slams the door shut for any funny business on her part PortTack Jun 2023 #87

There is a post in this thread with a mini tweet-thread explanation by Joyce (Alene) Vance BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #90

I heard that same explanation from, I can't remember who... SKKY Jun 2023 #62

The criminality never ends. Kablooie Jun 2023 #36

If she pulls Traildogbob Jun 2023 #49

a prosecutor can't appeal a finding of not guilty if it comes to that.... getagrip_already Jun 2023 #66

😡😡🤬🤬 Traildogbob Jun 2023 #71

If one juror fails to vote for conviction, it will be a hung jury. wnylib Jun 2023 #106

Could this be an effort by Merrick Garland to show the indictments are not politically motivated? LaMouffette Jun 2023 #43

Oh, FFS. Merrick has no authority to assign judges to cases. Ocelot II Jun 2023 #46

Thanks. I didn't know that. LaMouffette Jun 2023 #55

I thought this was on Onion piece. PlutosHeart Jun 2023 #47

Hopefully ONLY initially. And remember she was overruled several times by higher courts LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #56

Not just overruled, judicial spanking leaving marks! Alexander Of Assyria Jun 2023 #63

Haha! True! LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #73

Huh? How? Lulu KC Jun 2023 #58

You can be sure moniss Jun 2023 #65

In a state where it's legal to run into protesters Fullduplexxx Jun 2023 #75

WHY. With 26 district judges in the FL southern district, why should SHE be allowed to continue her ancianita Jun 2023 #72

cases are assigned randomly by a rotating wheel LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #74

A serious question deserves a serious answer. ancianita Jun 2023 #95

I was being serious. That's what I heard. Although I heard someone else say that it could have gone LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #98

Sure you were, because you know it for a fact. And now you 'heard someone else say..." ancianita Jun 2023 #101

Joyce White Vance on this story LymphocyteLover Jun 2023 #76

"...Judge Cannon must step aside if the case falls to her" Hortensis Jun 2023 #107

DOJ won't seek her removal for bias and the 11th Circuit wouldn't order it anyway. onenote Jun 2023 #118

Maybe. She found it persuasive, but like us she won't be Hortensis Jun 2023 #119

Michael Popok, from Meidas Touch Network, has said that Zilli Jun 2023 #86

And what makes Popok an expert? Marius25 Jun 2023 #89

Jack Smith and the DOJ knew this was possible/probable. SayItLoud Jun 2023 #88

45 has not done well with appointees so far, including the Surpreme Court. He's batting something .. marble falls Jun 2023 #91

You have to hope, Bayard Jun 2023 #93

One would think. Novara Jun 2023 #100

Depends on why Trump appointed her and what wnylib Jun 2023 #108

That was quick. orangecrush Jun 2023 #96

Folks, calm down. If true, this is JUST the arraignment, not the whole case. Novara Jun 2023 #99

When buttface is convicted, no one can claim she's a liberal judge serving Biden or the deep state.. Chakaconcarne Jun 2023 #103

No, but she could just give him probation instead of real jail time Marius25 Jun 2023 #126

He'll walk. Turbineguy Jun 2023 #110

As a taxpayer for the federal court syste I think We the People can demand that she be removed..... turbinetree Jun 2023 #111

I'm sorry, as a taxpayer, slightlv Jun 2023 #113

I see Merrick Garland's fingerprints all over this. He has been trying to slow this process since Handler Jun 2023 #112

I think you forgot the sarcasm smilie. onenote Jun 2023 #123

Justice must IMMEDIATELY file a request to change judges. lark Jun 2023 #115

You can take it to the bank that DOJ will not seek to have her removed on bias grounds. onenote Jun 2023 #117

That means things could get ugly depending on what she does Marius25 Jun 2023 #125

"That means Trump will likely get away with this" LudwigPastorius Jun 2023 #128

So the oligarchs have ruled for our death as a country! The sky is not Blue they say. lark Jun 2023 #131

Well said Handler Jun 2023 #120

Thank you lark Jun 2023 #130

"1/Before everyone gets too spun up about reports Judge Cannon" Cha Jun 2023 #121

The case she cites is not authority for reassigning Cannon onenote Jun 2023 #122

Of course she possesses no ethics and won't recuse herself SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #124

Asking for a friend ... jgo Jun 2023 #127