Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Congress to investigate Benghazi 'talking points' [View all]LoisB
(13,306 posts)13. Call me stupid, but I guess I don't understand the "problem". Is it that Susan Rice said the best
information they had at the time was that it started as a protest stemming from the video? Is it that the President didn't say "terrorist" often enough or loudly enough or quickly enough? Who had any "facts" about it other than that there was an attack and four Americans were killed?
How these Republicans sleep at night is beyond me. There is no "there", there except in their pea brains. Besides, what difference does it make if it was a spontaneous demonstration gone amok or a planned terrorist attack? Four people are dead and I'm sure it makes no difference to their families how it started.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
and the stupid investigations, waste everyones time, ensures nothing happens in congress ...
Mr. Sparkle
Nov 2012
#5
Call me stupid, but I guess I don't understand the "problem". Is it that Susan Rice said the best
LoisB
Nov 2012
#13
I thought Petraeus said Friday that he approved the "unclassified" version of the talking points
ciking724
Nov 2012
#24
Will any reporter ever tell the truth about what was really said by Susan Rice?
1springhill
Nov 2012
#25
This was all covered in Petraeus's testimony. This is a waste of time
ProfessionalLeftist
Nov 2012
#27
You know how police can't say everything they know to avoid revealing stuff to bad guys?
Beartracks
Nov 2012
#32