Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ancianita

(43,311 posts)

12. Yes, they are. Once on the nets means forever.

Reply to KS Toronado (Reply #9)

Sat Jul 29, 2023, 10:59 AM

Jul 2023

Legislation won't be enforceable. They won't even have to be 'sold' and therefore won't be subject to commerce clause backup. All that could be done is to catch the criminals who cause loss, harm or damage with them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court temporarily blocks 'ghost gun' ruling by federal judge [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 OP

I am uncomfortable with that guy... 2naSalit Jul 2023 #1

You and me both BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #3

Indeed. 2naSalit Jul 2023 #6

Justice Kagan is a busy Justice for the 9th! BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #8

It has totally pissed me off that the right wing male justices are "allotted" two districts each. ancianita Jul 2023 #11

It's by seniority Polybius Jul 2023 #13

And the size of the district FBaggins Jul 2023 #19

Well there are some interesting reasons why they are assigned to where they are assigned BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #14

Thank you. All this is logical re the right wing justices, but one doesn't have to like it. ancianita Jul 2023 #15

Well right now BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #16

True. Thanks for the historical context layout we live in. It's come up before but it merits review. ancianita Jul 2023 #17

He certainly didn't care about the flood of women's health problems SouthernDem4ever Jul 2023 #2

It seems that just like how Scalia used to operate BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #5

What in fuck is wrong with him 3Hotdogs Jul 2023 #4

In this case, he temporarily lifted a ban of the ghost gun Rule put in place by a RW lower court BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #7

Unfortunately ghost guns are probably here to stay KS Toronado Jul 2023 #9

I think that has been brought up as a suggestion BumRushDaShow Jul 2023 #10

Yes, they are. Once on the nets means forever. ancianita Jul 2023 #12

They are easily 3D printable now madville Jul 2023 #18