Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: FCC issues historic $300 million fine against the largest robocall scam it has ever investigated [View all]BumRushDaShow
(169,959 posts)13. Here is a good background article on this from a year ago when they were working on it
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/18/tech/auto-warranty-robocalls-case/index.html
And the answer to your question appears in the last paragraphs of it -
As I have posted over and over and over and over and over - (non-enforcement) regulatory civilian agencies (which are most of them) have no authority to bring criminal charges. That falls to DOJ. And there is a whole process to do that AFTER an agency exhausts their own statutory options and procedures (as people saw with NARA and the 45 Presidential Records stuff, where they finally did a referral to DOJ leading to the search and seizure warrants once they ran through their normal escalated compliance requests).
And the answer to your question appears in the last paragraphs of it -
(snip)
Authorities could also look at bringing criminal charges against repeat offenders. In the interview, Yost told CNN that option is still on the table for Cox and Jones.
Repeat violations of FTC civil settlements have also been known to lead to criminal contempt of court charges, Evans said. But federal decisions about bringing criminal lawsuits would fall to the Justice Department, not the FTC or FCC. While DOJ has sued some robocallers to obtain their fines, experts like Saunders say criminal prosecution could be messy and time-consuming, when other alternatives already exist.
Even as illegal robocalls appear to be on the decline, said YouMails Quilici, it isnt clear how steep and sustainable that trend is. The decline has coincided with reports of a troubling rise in text messaging spam.
Authorities could also look at bringing criminal charges against repeat offenders. In the interview, Yost told CNN that option is still on the table for Cox and Jones.
Repeat violations of FTC civil settlements have also been known to lead to criminal contempt of court charges, Evans said. But federal decisions about bringing criminal lawsuits would fall to the Justice Department, not the FTC or FCC. While DOJ has sued some robocallers to obtain their fines, experts like Saunders say criminal prosecution could be messy and time-consuming, when other alternatives already exist.
Even as illegal robocalls appear to be on the decline, said YouMails Quilici, it isnt clear how steep and sustainable that trend is. The decline has coincided with reports of a troubling rise in text messaging spam.
As I have posted over and over and over and over and over - (non-enforcement) regulatory civilian agencies (which are most of them) have no authority to bring criminal charges. That falls to DOJ. And there is a whole process to do that AFTER an agency exhausts their own statutory options and procedures (as people saw with NARA and the 45 Presidential Records stuff, where they finally did a referral to DOJ leading to the search and seizure warrants once they ran through their normal escalated compliance requests).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FCC issues historic $300 million fine against the largest robocall scam it has ever investigated [View all]
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
OP
Here is a good background article on this from a year ago when they were working on it
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#13
I apologize for not reading all your posts on the topic of regulatory civilian agencies.
maxsolomon
Aug 2023
#23
They have moved on now they are send emails with a bill for antivirus renewal notices.
usaf-vet
Aug 2023
#20
Billions of calls seems low to me - I'm pretty sure I receive 8-10 calls daily from these criminals.
Probatim
Aug 2023
#24