Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(43,294 posts)
5. What they are doing with this judge, with their lecture on her "possible" censorship,
Mon Aug 7, 2023, 06:28 PM
Aug 2023

with their sidelong contempt-driven, twisting of judicial ethics, with their "proposing" that the destructive, defamatory messaging of their client has no bearing on the court conditions for her, court officials, and the tenor of the trial.

Good luck telling a federal judge how to decide what communications are sensitive, and in effect, how to run her court. Telling a federal judge what her protective order judgment should entail?? Puh-lease.
Too stupid to be shady, these lawyers are just an embarrassment to their profession.

They'll fuck around and find out. She don't go for doing what Trump tells them to say. She don't play.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 page response to the 5-page proposed order by prosecutors. Asinine. n/t iluvtennis Aug 2023 #1
And I thought they said they didn't have enough time to respond ... doublethink Aug 2023 #2
Equals more billable hours? n/t thenelm1 Aug 2023 #11
Aww...No using "Truth" Social or Xitter to target and intimidate witnesses? LudwigPastorius Aug 2023 #3
LOL, the old school way 😂. n/t iluvtennis Aug 2023 #4
What they are doing with this judge, with their lecture on her "possible" censorship, ancianita Aug 2023 #5
+1 peppertree Aug 2023 #6
Key word..."limit." Tfg has no concept or forethought about what it might mean to be limited PortTack Aug 2023 #7
He can't be trusted to follow the current restrictive order SouthernDem4ever Aug 2023 #21
I'm no lawyer but... BaronChocula Aug 2023 #8
Traitortrump is not president. Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #9
That was the first thing that struck me about the article, slightlv Aug 2023 #12
I can imagine him having a tantrum if his lawyers used "Mr." Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2023 #13
It is media practice to say President Trump or Obama or Bush. former9thward Aug 2023 #23
Still pushing the First Amendment defense... Ford_Prefect Aug 2023 #10
How about each time he violates the Judge's orders BlueIdaho Aug 2023 #14
Surely The Judge will See Through This DallasNE Aug 2023 #15
Judge Chutkan isn't messing around! LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #16
TFG wants to try this case in the media rather than in the courtroom LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #17
The judge needs to give trump the Beetlejuice treatment. Ray Bruns Aug 2023 #18
... BumRushDaShow Aug 2023 #20
I am secretly in love with Judge Chutkan Novara Aug 2023 #19
Judge Tanya Chutkan is not messing around LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2023 #22
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump lawyers seek to nar...»Reply #5