Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 3 local ships extend deployment amid Gaza conflict (US warships turn around) [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)10. Nasser, right
Boy, I'm just on a roll tonight.
We can't forget the role the USSR played i nthe debacle, either;
http://www.sixdaywar.org/content/soviets.asp
The Soviet Union exerted a troublesome influence on the events leading up to the war by feeding Arab suspicions about Israel. This culminated in the delivery to the Syrians and Egyptians of a false alert on May 13 that Israel had massed troops near the Israeli-Syrian border in preparation for an attack on Syria.
Although it is not clear that the Soviets actually desired a war, a recent book by Gideon Remez and Isabella Ginor, Foxbats over Dimona: The Soviets' Nuclear Gamble in the Six-Day War, makes the controversial contention that the Soviet Union intentionally sparked the war in order to justify an attack against Israel's nuclear facility in Dimona. Israel's rapid and overwhelming success undermined the plan, the authors argue.
Although it is not clear that the Soviets actually desired a war, a recent book by Gideon Remez and Isabella Ginor, Foxbats over Dimona: The Soviets' Nuclear Gamble in the Six-Day War, makes the controversial contention that the Soviet Union intentionally sparked the war in order to justify an attack against Israel's nuclear facility in Dimona. Israel's rapid and overwhelming success undermined the plan, the authors argue.
The bolded text is why Nasser was making fast alliances and moving his forces - not because he planned to attack Israel, but because the USSR had told Nasser that Israel was planning to attack. At the time, Egypt and Syria were united as one country; the United Arab republic.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
3 local ships extend deployment amid Gaza conflict (US warships turn around) [View all]
icymist
Nov 2012
OP
This is a lot different. Israel was actually fighting for its survival in the 67 war. That is not
still_one
Nov 2012
#2
Do you know (I don't) whether Israel attacked the parked tanks first and then the USS Liberty, or
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#5
They did a pre-emptive attack because Nasser was calling for the total destruction of Isreal, and
still_one
Nov 2012
#15
I agree "That 6 day war in no way justifies what happened to the Liberty."
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#18
We agree, good. Now if they can get the Israel and Palestinians to the negotiating table, maybe the
still_one
Nov 2012
#21
Sorry, Nasser had every intention to attack. Using counterpunch and your other rerferences are not
still_one
Nov 2012
#16
You have your view, I have mine. The rendition you just presented is horseshit mythology.
still_one
Nov 2012
#14
Yes Israel fired the first shot, no question about that. In the 1973 war Israel did delay, and
still_one
Nov 2012
#20
"Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel. The Arab people want to fight."
hack89
Nov 2012
#24
Even if that was true how does that have anything to do with Israel bombing a US ship?
Puregonzo1188
Nov 2012
#30
Plus, during the extended attack, the attackers were close enough to see up to 3 US flags during
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#34
(1) You ask, "Why is that?" The answer is that the U.S. Navy should learn from its experience and
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#11
What I agree with is that I would "get no response acknowledging the legitimacy of (my) points."
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#33
If you "take absolutely NOTHING s/he says seriously," why are you telling that to me?
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#36
Since I assume the ships would be there to defend Israel, I'm not sure I understand
Marrah_G
Nov 2012
#23