Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(170,521 posts)
Fri Sep 22, 2023, 09:00 PM Sep 2023

US judge strikes down California ban on high-capacity gun magazines [View all]

Source: Reuters

September 22, 2023 5:48 PM EDT


Sept 22 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California on Friday declared that state's ban on magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition unconstitutional, saying it violated the Second Amendment rights of firearms owners. U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego said California's "sweeping ban" went too far by preventing people from using magazines for lawful purposes, including self-defense.

"The history and tradition of the Second Amendment clearly supports state laws against the use or misuse of firearms with unlawful intent, but not the disarmament of the law-abiding citizen," Benitez wrote in a 71-page decision. Benitez cited a June 2022 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v Bruen, requiring that firearms restrictions be "consistent with this nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation" to pass muster.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who enforces the state's laws, plans to seek a stay while he appeals the decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. He said Californians need to be kept safe from weapons enhancements that are "designed" to cause mass casualties.

"The Supreme Court was clear that Bruen did not create a regulatory straitjacket for states--and we believe that the district court got this wrong," Bonta said. "We will move quickly to correct this incredibly dangerous mistake." Benitez delayed enforcing his injunction against the law for 10 days to give Bonta time to seek a stay.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-judge-strikes-down-california-ban-high-capacity-gun-magazines-2023-09-22/

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
He's just looking out for our 2nd Amendment-protected right to own machine guns and howitzers. TheRickles Sep 2023 #1
fing fascist . GreenWave Sep 2023 #2
I'm sorry, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution about magazine sizes sakabatou Sep 2023 #3
He was a Shrub appointee rated as "unqualified" by the ABA. BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #5
Yet somehow he was confirmed by a 98-1 vote. n/t Calista241 Sep 2023 #9
I read that BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #10
Different times Polybius Sep 2023 #12
I know, right - it's not like the 10 rounds allowed can't kill when used by an experienced shooter Backseat Driver Sep 2023 #13
When it was written they had muzzel loaders Woodwizard Sep 2023 #39
There are a lot more weapons coming down the pike. Able to kill 100's at a time. erronis Sep 2023 #4
well said Evolve Dammit Sep 2023 #38
Bush judge. Ignore the ruling. Seeking Serenity Sep 2023 #6
Part 1 of 2. DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #7
This country has gone off the rails. Jack-o-Lantern Sep 2023 #8
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Initech Sep 2023 #11
Does that mean I can order a Howitzer now? James48 Sep 2023 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Sep 2023 #18
Fck howzers, u have a second amend-mint right to speak easy Sep 2023 #19
It does not. ManiacJoe Sep 2023 #23
One big difference is that there are presently a lot of legally owned hi-cap magazines out there Shermann Sep 2023 #26
We have a similar law in Colorado mountain grammy Sep 2023 #15
It's being challenged again, in federal court sl8 Sep 2023 #25
There is only 1 reason to have a magazine with more than 10 rounds, to kill people MiniMe Sep 2023 #16
If you need more than five rounds to hit the target Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #17
Six rounds. Who is gonna rob you, speak easy Sep 2023 #20
Putin might try Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #21
No garden variety HIMARS 4 me, I go for the big guns, speak easy Sep 2023 #22
I'm guessing he gets off on watching news and finding out that innocent people were mutilated. C Moon Sep 2023 #24
Guess mass killers are entitled to more rights in this judge's eyes. Vinca Sep 2023 #27
Need to make it manditory Old Crank Sep 2023 #28
A gun needs to kill faster.... Historic NY Sep 2023 #29
"Historical tradition of firearm regulation" Bayard Sep 2023 #30
Good ruling TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #31
Interesting that you're rooting for a fascist Supreme Court. Elessar Zappa Sep 2023 #33
I don't think you understand the meaning TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #34
Arm everyone Marthe48 Sep 2023 #32
There is nothing in the 2nd amendment about high capacity clips Novara Sep 2023 #35
The Brady Bill DallasNE Sep 2023 #36
Every challenge to the old Federal Assault Weapons ban failed DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #37
It took Brady a dozen years after being shot BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #41
"preventing people from using magazines for lawful purposes, including self-defense." SouthernDem4ever Sep 2023 #40
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US judge strikes down Cal...