Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

GreenWave

(12,626 posts)

2. fing fascist .

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Sep 22, 2023, 09:08 PM

Sep 2023

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US judge strikes down California ban on high-capacity gun magazines [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 OP

He's just looking out for our 2nd Amendment-protected right to own machine guns and howitzers. TheRickles Sep 2023 #1

fing fascist . GreenWave Sep 2023 #2

I'm sorry, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution about magazine sizes sakabatou Sep 2023 #3

He was a Shrub appointee rated as "unqualified" by the ABA. BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #5

Yet somehow he was confirmed by a 98-1 vote. n/t Calista241 Sep 2023 #9

I read that BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #10

Different times Polybius Sep 2023 #12

I know, right - it's not like the 10 rounds allowed can't kill when used by an experienced shooter Backseat Driver Sep 2023 #13

When it was written they had muzzel loaders Woodwizard Sep 2023 #39

There are a lot more weapons coming down the pike. Able to kill 100's at a time. erronis Sep 2023 #4

well said Evolve Dammit Sep 2023 #38

Bush judge. Ignore the ruling. Seeking Serenity Sep 2023 #6

Part 1 of 2. DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #7

This country has gone off the rails. Jack-o-Lantern Sep 2023 #8

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Initech Sep 2023 #11

Does that mean I can order a Howitzer now? James48 Sep 2023 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Sep 2023 #18

Fck howzers, u have a second amend-mint right to speak easy Sep 2023 #19

It does not. ManiacJoe Sep 2023 #23

One big difference is that there are presently a lot of legally owned hi-cap magazines out there Shermann Sep 2023 #26

We have a similar law in Colorado mountain grammy Sep 2023 #15

It's being challenged again, in federal court sl8 Sep 2023 #25

There is only 1 reason to have a magazine with more than 10 rounds, to kill people MiniMe Sep 2023 #16

If you need more than five rounds to hit the target Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #17

Six rounds. Who is gonna rob you, speak easy Sep 2023 #20

Putin might try Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #21

No garden variety HIMARS 4 me, I go for the big guns, speak easy Sep 2023 #22

I'm guessing he gets off on watching news and finding out that innocent people were mutilated. C Moon Sep 2023 #24

Guess mass killers are entitled to more rights in this judge's eyes. Vinca Sep 2023 #27

Need to make it manditory Old Crank Sep 2023 #28

A gun needs to kill faster.... Historic NY Sep 2023 #29

"Historical tradition of firearm regulation" Bayard Sep 2023 #30

Good ruling TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #31

Interesting that you're rooting for a fascist Supreme Court. Elessar Zappa Sep 2023 #33

I don't think you understand the meaning TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #34

Arm everyone Marthe48 Sep 2023 #32

There is nothing in the 2nd amendment about high capacity clips Novara Sep 2023 #35

The Brady Bill DallasNE Sep 2023 #36

Every challenge to the old Federal Assault Weapons ban failed DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #37

It took Brady a dozen years after being shot BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #41

"preventing people from using magazines for lawful purposes, including self-defense." SouthernDem4ever Sep 2023 #40