US judge strikes down California ban on high-capacity gun magazines

[Backseat Driver]

13. I know, right - it's not like the 10 rounds allowed can't kill when used by an experienced shooter

and his weapon at a range, for instance; just a bit less convenient. Without the weapon, ammunition is near harmless - this judge's ruling doesn't preclude a shooter's ability to bear a loaded weapon nor use it with responsible intent, but that shooter surely doesn't require a high-volume magazine - that speaks more to the willfull shooter's intent to kill and injure as many as the shooter can deliver to many more targets, er...I mean persons (or some huge sci-fi fantasy beast). THIS IS ABOUT CONTROL of a weapon's use to a maximum of 10 convenient shots, NOT THE FUNCTIONAL INTENT of a shooter bearing a maximally functional death weapon on a single or multiple targets.

Benitez is just wrong! It's a worthwhile restrictive law of functional weapon control!