Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Marthe48

(23,149 posts)

32. Arm everyone

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sat Sep 23, 2023, 03:44 PM

Sep 2023

The arms dealers benefit, who knows who they share their loot with, and the rw has their untrained, unpaid, unmanaged army all set to answer when the rw whistles go out. Win win for all the fascist shits, lose-lose for sanity.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US judge strikes down California ban on high-capacity gun magazines [View all] BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 OP

He's just looking out for our 2nd Amendment-protected right to own machine guns and howitzers. TheRickles Sep 2023 #1

fing fascist . GreenWave Sep 2023 #2

I'm sorry, I don't see anywhere in the Constitution about magazine sizes sakabatou Sep 2023 #3

He was a Shrub appointee rated as "unqualified" by the ABA. BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #5

Yet somehow he was confirmed by a 98-1 vote. n/t Calista241 Sep 2023 #9

I read that BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #10

Different times Polybius Sep 2023 #12

I know, right - it's not like the 10 rounds allowed can't kill when used by an experienced shooter Backseat Driver Sep 2023 #13

When it was written they had muzzel loaders Woodwizard Sep 2023 #39

There are a lot more weapons coming down the pike. Able to kill 100's at a time. erronis Sep 2023 #4

well said Evolve Dammit Sep 2023 #38

Bush judge. Ignore the ruling. Seeking Serenity Sep 2023 #6

Part 1 of 2. DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #7

This country has gone off the rails. Jack-o-Lantern Sep 2023 #8

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Initech Sep 2023 #11

Does that mean I can order a Howitzer now? James48 Sep 2023 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author speak easy Sep 2023 #18

Fck howzers, u have a second amend-mint right to speak easy Sep 2023 #19

It does not. ManiacJoe Sep 2023 #23

One big difference is that there are presently a lot of legally owned hi-cap magazines out there Shermann Sep 2023 #26

We have a similar law in Colorado mountain grammy Sep 2023 #15

It's being challenged again, in federal court sl8 Sep 2023 #25

There is only 1 reason to have a magazine with more than 10 rounds, to kill people MiniMe Sep 2023 #16

If you need more than five rounds to hit the target Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #17

Six rounds. Who is gonna rob you, speak easy Sep 2023 #20

Putin might try Wolf Frankula Sep 2023 #21

No garden variety HIMARS 4 me, I go for the big guns, speak easy Sep 2023 #22

I'm guessing he gets off on watching news and finding out that innocent people were mutilated. C Moon Sep 2023 #24

Guess mass killers are entitled to more rights in this judge's eyes. Vinca Sep 2023 #27

Need to make it manditory Old Crank Sep 2023 #28

A gun needs to kill faster.... Historic NY Sep 2023 #29

"Historical tradition of firearm regulation" Bayard Sep 2023 #30

Good ruling TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #31

Interesting that you're rooting for a fascist Supreme Court. Elessar Zappa Sep 2023 #33

I don't think you understand the meaning TexasDem69 Sep 2023 #34

Arm everyone Marthe48 Sep 2023 #32

There is nothing in the 2nd amendment about high capacity clips Novara Sep 2023 #35

The Brady Bill DallasNE Sep 2023 #36

Every challenge to the old Federal Assault Weapons ban failed DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2023 #37

It took Brady a dozen years after being shot BumRushDaShow Sep 2023 #41

"preventing people from using magazines for lawful purposes, including self-defense." SouthernDem4ever Sep 2023 #40