Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
20. "You don't get a license to be a contractor, despite not meeting the qualifications"
Wed Nov 15, 2023, 02:46 PM
Nov 2023

You also don't get Courts or anyone else to rule on those qualifications until they apply for the license. The possibility that someone WILL apply for a Contractor's license in the future is not the basis for a judgement.

Arguably, everyone convicted for January 6th should also be ineligible but we're not ruling on their eligibility at this point because none of them are a candidate for Federal office.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Had to dig a bit, but he is a Republican ColinC Nov 2023 #1
Nothing in the ruling suggests a political bias. brooklynite Nov 2023 #2
I haven't read it but I believe you ColinC Nov 2023 #9
The ruling is pretty much the same as the Minnesota ruling... brooklynite Nov 2023 #10
Primaries are seen as different than general elections getagrip_already Nov 2023 #3
"the Colorado Court will rule against tiny" TwilightZone Nov 2023 #4
Just on her rulings to date and evidence presented... getagrip_already Nov 2023 #5
Not surprised without a relevant conviction Fiendish Thingy Nov 2023 #6
Well? 3825-87867 Nov 2023 #7
"Insurrection" is a Federal crime...for which Trump has not been indicted. brooklynite Nov 2023 #8
Judge Luttig went through all of this a couple of weeks ago moniss Nov 2023 #12
He's entitled to his opinion...but he's not the decider of fact in this case. brooklynite Nov 2023 #15
Yes he's not the decider but he is a well recognized moniss Nov 2023 #17
It is not about whether a state has insurrection enshrined in their moniss Nov 2023 #21
Your outrage is noted... brooklynite Nov 2023 #22
The reality is that a couple of lower moniss Nov 2023 #26
These judges so far are being ridiculous moniss Nov 2023 #11
Why do we have court's then ! Jurisdiction - noclue023 Nov 2023 #13
Not what they're saying brooklynite Nov 2023 #16
The courts are ducking the matter and moniss Nov 2023 #18
"You don't get a license to be a contractor, despite not meeting the qualifications" brooklynite Nov 2023 #20
It is not arguable that in the 14th that all insurrectionists or people who rebel moniss Nov 2023 #23
"let the candidate apply to be on the ballot" brooklynite Nov 2023 #24
The Michigan case was about the primary moniss Nov 2023 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Nov 2023 #28
In the Minnesota and Michigan cases, the Court rules that Primaries are not State Elections... brooklynite Nov 2023 #29
This is precisely moniss Nov 2023 #30
What I'm seeing is "I disagree with the Court ruling, so the Court must be irresponsible in that ruling" brooklynite Nov 2023 #31
Not at all. moniss Nov 2023 #32
a tough one azureblue Nov 2023 #14
CREW provided the best results in NM, denying Couy G from holding office duhneece Nov 2023 #19
Well so far he still hasnt been convicted of anything. oldsoftie Nov 2023 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge allows Trump on Mic...»Reply #20