Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

28. It depends on their reason for being there

Reply to hunter (Reply #24)

Mon Jan 1, 2024, 10:20 AM

Jan 2024

"Sorry - I don't permit guns on my property" won't get you very far if they're investigating a crime with reasonable suspicion, are chasing someone else, or have a warrant (etc)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

29 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US appeals court allows California to bar guns in most public places [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 2023 OP

Go 9th Circuit!!! Nictuku Dec 2023 #1

This one won't be appealed FBaggins Dec 2023 #15

Probably won't survive SCOTUS. That's why I advocate the States pass laws that to own guns you must be a member of cstanleytech Dec 2023 #2

2d Amendment protects rights of the "people" TexasDem69 Dec 2023 #3

It specifically says though that it's because we need a "well regulated Militia". A State can create said militia cstanleytech Dec 2023 #6

Well, sort of TexasDem69 Dec 2023 #7

It specifically says that it's written that way due to the need for said militia. If a State is running a militia that cstanleytech Dec 2023 #9

Right or wrong (wrong) - that reading is inconsistent with current SCOTUS precedent FBaggins Dec 2023 #14

Have they ever ruled differently in the past? EX500rider Dec 2023 #18

Differently? Yes. But nothing like this. FBaggins Dec 2023 #19

Indeed, with the Militia Act of 1903 still law, all able-bodied men between ages 17 and 45 are in the Reserve Militia EX500rider Dec 2023 #20

It could be argued that the militia in question is that of one run by the State. That means the State should cstanleytech Jan 2024 #23

All able-bodied men between ages 17 and 45 in the US are already members of the Reserve Militia EX500rider Dec 2023 #17

Good republianmushroom Dec 2023 #4

Hallelujah for the 9th Circuit Hekate Dec 2023 #5

If it didn't fly in New York, it won't fly in California NickB79 Dec 2023 #8

Majority of the court are already backwards Marthe48 Jan 2024 #25

I don't see the pistol packin' dipshits, generally Kalifornia9 Dec 2023 #10

Keep up the work. twodogsbarking Dec 2023 #11

I know that the second amendment applies to citizens on public property tavernier Dec 2023 #12

That has been an issue the "no restrictions" crowd BumRushDaShow Dec 2023 #13

Thanks! tavernier Dec 2023 #21

Private property owners can always restrict guns on their own property FBaggins Dec 2023 #16

Thanks! tavernier Dec 2023 #22

How is "law enforcement" an exception? hunter Jan 2024 #24

It depends on their reason for being there FBaggins Jan 2024 #28

Just saying "no" has got me so far that I'll probably never serve on a jury in this county. hunter Jan 2024 #29

Absolutely. "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone." marble falls Jan 2024 #27

A small but significant start. marble falls Jan 2024 #26