Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

oldmanlynn

(879 posts)

5. Im worried that Bradley has information about willis and wade

Reply to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Mon Feb 26, 2024, 10:03 PM

Feb 2024

Im worried that Bradley has information about willis and wade that contradicts what wade and willis claimed. However i think they need to show that a romantic relationship is different than just friends or friends with benefits.

If the judge sinks willis participation then tgis trial will be kicked to the republican attorney and it will be delayed.

I hope i am wrong. There is alot of smoke even if they sexed for 3-4 years it doesnt change whether willis benefited or not.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge: Law partner must testify about Wade's relationship with Willis [View all] Jose Garcia Feb 2024 OP

Just gotta ask what the hell did the judge see or hear that would force bluestarone Feb 2024 #1

This judge is really out of control. So much irrelevant bs is being spooky3 Feb 2024 #2

I don't think he's out of control. EndlessWire Feb 2024 #6

Jill Wine Banks and Katie Phang, among others, disagree with you spooky3 Feb 2024 #11

Not really. n/t EndlessWire Feb 2024 #12

It was left open at the hearing FBaggins Feb 2024 #7

Can we also hear about the sexual relationships of the lawyers and the judge. Historic NY Feb 2024 #3

I guess lying nowforever Feb 2024 #4

Im worried that Bradley has information about willis and wade oldmanlynn Feb 2024 #5

Obviously Willis/Wade are worried too FBaggins Feb 2024 #8

There is also the possibility that moniss Feb 2024 #9

doesn't sound good. nt BootinUp Feb 2024 #10

Entertaining this entire thing as a "conflict of interest" is preposterous in the first place Novara Feb 2024 #13

They may be well past that FBaggins Feb 2024 #14

I agree Kaleva Feb 2024 #15

This is a they say/they say thing. There's no hard proof of lying. Novara Feb 2024 #16

The standard is the preponderance of evidence, not 100% absolute proof MichMan Feb 2024 #19

Not really FBaggins Feb 2024 #20

The legal system holds prosecutors and other officers of the court to a much higher standard than others MichMan Feb 2024 #18

Wake me up when the prurient hearing is over Marthe48 Feb 2024 #17

Oh no! Another fail for Trump cultists: Kingofalldems Feb 2024 #21