Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Novara

(6,115 posts)
16. This is a they say/they say thing. There's no hard proof of lying.
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 09:42 AM
Feb 2024

How are they going to prove anyone was lying under oath? Even having phone records only proves that calls were made, not the content. They could be legitimate business calls.

Unless someone comes up with physical evidence that Willis and Wade are lying about dates, no one can prove it.

And it's still not a conflict of interest. They are being dragged through the mud for nothing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just gotta ask what the hell did the judge see or hear that would force bluestarone Feb 2024 #1
This judge is really out of control. So much irrelevant bs is being spooky3 Feb 2024 #2
I don't think he's out of control. EndlessWire Feb 2024 #6
Jill Wine Banks and Katie Phang, among others, disagree with you spooky3 Feb 2024 #11
Not really. n/t EndlessWire Feb 2024 #12
It was left open at the hearing FBaggins Feb 2024 #7
Can we also hear about the sexual relationships of the lawyers and the judge. Historic NY Feb 2024 #3
I guess lying nowforever Feb 2024 #4
Im worried that Bradley has information about willis and wade oldmanlynn Feb 2024 #5
Obviously Willis/Wade are worried too FBaggins Feb 2024 #8
There is also the possibility that moniss Feb 2024 #9
doesn't sound good. nt BootinUp Feb 2024 #10
Entertaining this entire thing as a "conflict of interest" is preposterous in the first place Novara Feb 2024 #13
They may be well past that FBaggins Feb 2024 #14
I agree Kaleva Feb 2024 #15
This is a they say/they say thing. There's no hard proof of lying. Novara Feb 2024 #16
The standard is the preponderance of evidence, not 100% absolute proof MichMan Feb 2024 #19
Not really FBaggins Feb 2024 #20
The legal system holds prosecutors and other officers of the court to a much higher standard than others MichMan Feb 2024 #18
Wake me up when the prurient hearing is over Marthe48 Feb 2024 #17
Oh no! Another fail for Trump cultists: Kingofalldems Feb 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge: Law partner must t...»Reply #16