Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JoseBalow

(9,975 posts)
18. "28% of participants responded that they read everything they shared"
Tue Mar 5, 2024, 06:51 PM
Mar 2024

I suspect the number of those commenting is even far less than the "OP" sharers

In a series of seven studies, the researchers demonstrated that sharing content increased a person’s “subjective knowledge,” which is the belief that they know certain information rather than actually (objectively) knowing that information. Why would people believe something that is so obviously not true (if they think about it for just a minute)? These researchers posited that we “internalize” these behaviors in social settings (including online), allowing the behavior (sharing knowledge) to inform how we think about ourselves. So, we unconsciously believe that sharing something on social media means something: It tells others that we think we are knowledgeable about a particular topic.

But what if we share something we didn’t read? It’s so easy to share information on social media (much easier than in a face-to-face conversation) that we may unthinkingly share an item without even clicking on it. Indeed, a majority of the time (59%!), people posting links on Twitter do not themselves click on the link they share. That means about three out of every five articles you see on Twitter, on average, have not been read by the person who posted them! (We’ve written previously about measures Twitter has taken to encourage users to read before posting—for example, nudges.) Similarly, in the research article mentioned above, only 28% of participants responded that they read everything they shared. The researchers wrote: “The ease of sharing via social media enables—and perhaps encourages—consumers to share information that they did not generate and have not even read.”

--snip--

We are not indicting our critics as somehow being unique in sharing without reading. In all fairness, the data suggest that most people engage in this behavior, at least some of the time. This example is simply a reminder that we should always read before we share. That way, we know that what we are sharing is accurate and a reflection of how we wish to portray ourselves. It also prevents us from succumbing to the psychological phenomenon of believing we are knowledgeable about a topic when we objectively are not. Reading generally makes us more knowledgeable, but not reading does not.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/misinformation-desk/202212/study-few-people-read-what-they-share

I share (comment), therefore I think?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K & R......................... Lovie777 Mar 2024 #1
KNEW IT ! ! ! no_hypocrisy Mar 2024 #2
Excellent! pandr32 Mar 2024 #3
Too bad she can't say a few words to the friends of her husband's murderer. Harker Mar 2024 #4
Damn 3auld6phart Mar 2024 #26
i feel her just being there is enough to seethe and see red . AllaN01Bear Mar 2024 #33
Great move! BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #5
This makes me smile LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2024 #6
Putin thought he had trouble with Navalny. He hasn't seen anything yet. Joinfortmill Mar 2024 #7
Without a moments hesitation.... SergeStorms Mar 2024 #34
❤️ littlemissmartypants Mar 2024 #8
I hope the maga cretins don't embarrass the country JohnSJ Mar 2024 #9
Why would they not? COL Mustard Mar 2024 #15
I often wonder what percentage of DUers actually read an entire post. mobeau69 Mar 2024 #10
The -invitation- is international news. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #12
"28% of participants responded that they read everything they shared" JoseBalow Mar 2024 #18
Interesting but not surprising. mobeau69 Mar 2024 #28
It would be nice if every time there's applause a Russian munitions factory blew up. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #11
Excellent idea. Lets see which republicans sit on their hands for her. oldsoftie Mar 2024 #13
Bittersweet StarryNite Mar 2024 #14
I hope our president blue-wave Mar 2024 #16
Will She Be Able To Attend? WiVoter Mar 2024 #17
Nope BigmanPigman Mar 2024 #19
Oh How I Wish She Could Be There WiVoter Mar 2024 #21
So do I. BigmanPigman Mar 2024 #22
I would have been surprised if she had been allowed to attend Bayard Mar 2024 #30
"Little" BigmanPigman Mar 2024 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author BootinUp Mar 2024 #20
That was a good move; too bad she can't be there. brer cat Mar 2024 #23
K&R... ificandream Mar 2024 #24
Brilliant!! I was hoping for this! lastlib Mar 2024 #25
If she was able to attend it would completely boil pootie's grits. rubbersole Mar 2024 #27
Yay! Drum Mar 2024 #29
Yulia Navalnaya, will be a guest at SOTU this year. LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2024 #31
Masterful nt Xipe Totec Mar 2024 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Alexei Navalny's widow in...»Reply #18