Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

bluestarone

(21,869 posts)

19. Not a lawyer here, so i'm asking, has this judge seen all the evidence Fani and her associates have concerning

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Wed Mar 13, 2024, 11:29 AM

Mar 2024

These charges that he dismissed? If not, could she ask for reconsideration?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge dismisses some charges against Trump in the Georgia 2020 election interference case [View all] BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 OP

Before I start running in tiny circles screaming, I will wait for the DU... Hugin Mar 2024 #1

AP is continually updating BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #3

I am tentatively optimistic that this is a sign of... Hugin Mar 2024 #7

Hopefully BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #8

From what I heard on NPR and as I understand it... forgotmylogin Mar 2024 #34

Yeah I have been seeing more explanation about the "vagueness" BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #35

The judge thought that the phone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger was weak. ... aggiesal Mar 2024 #9

"Before I start running in tiny circles screaming," mysteryowl Mar 2024 #23

"I would insert here the emoji: running-with-hair-on-fire and screaming, if I had it." BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #25

I gotta grab that link! Hugin Mar 2024 #28

YES! this is the one! mysteryowl Mar 2024 #36

My pleasure. Hugin Mar 2024 #27

Trump wins yet again angrychair Mar 2024 #2

we're all tired NJCher Mar 2024 #13

That is exactly how MAGA wants you to feel. nt Wednesdays Mar 2024 #15

Somehow, someway, I am certain this will be blamed on Merrick Garland. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #4

LOL BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #5

It sounds like McAfee wants Willis to build a stronger, more "convictable" case Novara Mar 2024 #6

calling Andrew Weissman, calling Andrew Weissman NJCher Mar 2024 #14

See? It's an invitation to re-indict with more of an air tight case. Novara Mar 2024 #17

-- NJCher Mar 2024 #21

What is known about this judge? Good guy, AKA fair and just? Or ambitious and open to manipulation? Attilatheblond Mar 2024 #10

Supposedly linked to the Federalist Society Kennah Mar 2024 #11

oh damn, not a promising situation n/t Attilatheblond Mar 2024 #12

He was Vice President of the local chapter in law school Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2024 #18

Damn.... Attilatheblond Mar 2024 #24

As a prosecutor, he was known as being pretty thorough and even-keeled. GregariousGroundhog Mar 2024 #20

Link to Judge McAfee's decision. onenote Mar 2024 #16

Not a lawyer here, so i'm asking, has this judge seen all the evidence Fani and her associates have concerning bluestarone Mar 2024 #19

Shame Fani Willis couldn't add on charges KS Toronado Mar 2024 #22

Excellent explanation on the decision from MEIDASTOUCH here. Ellipsis Mar 2024 #26

'Not sufficient facts to support solicitation claim,' elleng Mar 2024 #29

I'm hearing that the phone call maybe inadmissible DVRacer Mar 2024 #30

"The point of contention is Florida is a two party consent state requiring all parties to know it's being recorded" BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #32

It was Trump's weasel language. "We need only 11,000 votes." "I have to find 12,000 votes." LudwigPastorius Mar 2024 #33

where are you hearing that the call may be inadmissible? onenote Mar 2024 #38

Removing the "perfect" phone call removes the most viceral polically damaging piece of evidence LiberalLovinLug Mar 2024 #31

McAfee expressly did NOT remove the "perfect" phone call. onenote Mar 2024 #37