Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,427 posts)
21. Yep. The ruling is unnecessary baby splitting just for the sake of baby splitting. But it is what it is.
Fri Mar 15, 2024, 09:53 AM
Mar 2024

The hearing should have been short and sweet - the judge could have taken the trump/defense claims at face value and ruled that being a couple and going on vacations together has no basis in law to require removal of a prosecutor.

The rest was all an attempt at throwing sand in the face of justice on the part of well financed CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS and the judge should have shut it down.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Find and hire a MONSTER prosecutor... Climate Crusader Mar 2024 #1
Please hire a black woman. Please hire a black woman. Please hire a black woman. Kennah Mar 2024 #32
As long as whoever is hired is a beast, I'm down. Climate Crusader Mar 2024 #43
Ms Willis is a MONSTER prosecutor...but thinking about your post, I agree she should take a back seat iluvtennis Mar 2024 #63
Got that ruling right here: mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #2
Two weeks to issue moniss Mar 2024 #18
Even a perception of conflict of interest has to be taken seriously to avoid successful appeals. Good ruling. Martin68 Mar 2024 #30
It's not a matter of internet speed moniss Mar 2024 #44
I thought they were examining evidence to determine whether an affair took place, when it started, and how Martin68 Mar 2024 #47
The decision is boilerplate moniss Mar 2024 #60
I'm afraid you misunderstood my point. I know exactly what boilerplate means. You were responding to a comment I made Martin68 Mar 2024 #85
I'm not talking about moniss Mar 2024 #86
I hand't seen that additional information when I wrote my post. Martin68 Mar 2024 #87
Agree...stop the frump lovers from flapping their jaws...at least for now. PortTack Mar 2024 #51
So I guess now that it comes out that moniss Mar 2024 #80
"Impropriety"? "Irreparably damaged"? Bull SHIT! Prosecute the criminals, Willis. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #3
Totally agree. republianmushroom Mar 2024 #24
I guess we ought to be thankful that the judge didn't say she should smile more. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #26
Although he did say her behavior on the stand spooky3 Mar 2024 #33
Well the decision seems easy, although AP did a doozy of a headline BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #4
The ruling makes perfect sense to me Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #14
IIRC, he is an outside "contractor" as it is BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #16
Agree. I like this decision. ananda Mar 2024 #19
You mean her decision to have a relationship with a consenting adult? sybylla Mar 2024 #20
A consenting adult who is on her payroll ....really, you should not be sleeping with a subordinate....... bottomofthehill Mar 2024 #31
Special prosecutor was not on a higher pay rate people Mar 2024 #36
we was being paid $250.00 an hour that would be $500,000 a year, staff lawyers make $175,000 bottomofthehill Mar 2024 #62
Wade was getting paid the same hourly rate as the other two special prosecutors contracted for this case. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #69
Some people just can't stand it that a black woman NanaCat Mar 2024 #72
Yeah, little missy shouldn't be so uppity in her high and mighty independence. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #27
You're clearly not familiar with common ethics rules regarding workplace relationships. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #41
What law did she break? What rights of the defendants were diminished? Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #48
"It's not illegal!" Is the weakest of defences. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #50
You failed to answer a single question. This is not sexual harassment. Hermit-The-Prog Mar 2024 #52
Who said it was? Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #67
Willis was not his "supervisor." Wade is an independent contractor. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #70
False Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #74
No, what you said is false. Willis did not hire him. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #77
Sexual harassment is not the standard NanaCat Mar 2024 #73
There are policies but many do NOT strictly forbid workplace spooky3 Mar 2024 #59
I don't know where you have worked Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #65
I was a management professor who did research on the topic spooky3 Mar 2024 #66
Then surely you are aware of the standards that exist around relationships between supervisors and hires. Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #68
Surely you are aware of the difference between employees and independent contractors. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #71
Willis was indeed his supervisor Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #75
No, she was not. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #76
The judge needs to be investigated. LiberalFighter Mar 2024 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #10
for what? prodigitalson Mar 2024 #11
For making the correct ruling? Weird. jimfields33 Mar 2024 #40
Georgia law only requires disqualification of a DA upon proof of a financial conflict of interest. SunSeeker Mar 2024 #79
Oh I love this......! nickster48 Mar 2024 #6
Seems to me this is an acceptable ruling. Prairie_Seagull Mar 2024 #7
Thank god! This is a huge win for justice... SKKY Mar 2024 #8
I think the documents case is the most important. ificandream Mar 2024 #12
The federal case is definitely important BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #17
I should know this as a historian who took a BlueKota Mar 2024 #55
The only way they can appeal to a federal court BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #56
Thank you! BlueKota Mar 2024 #58
Most welcome! BumRushDaShow Mar 2024 #61
Let me be clear, I think they're all important, for sure... SKKY Mar 2024 #81
I don't agree with the ruling but think the case needs to move on neohippie Mar 2024 #9
Yep. The ruling is unnecessary baby splitting just for the sake of baby splitting. But it is what it is. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2024 #21
The appearance of impropriety is important ripcord Mar 2024 #37
So, this delay could have been avoided if she hadn't hired him in the first place Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #13
Exactly! berksdem Mar 2024 #15
A) Besides Trump talking points, where's the evidence sybylla Mar 2024 #22
Before/After Doesn't matter Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #23
Before/after does matter because it shows sybylla Mar 2024 #28
Sounds right to me, SIDESHOW. elleng Mar 2024 #46
There was discredited testimony. spooky3 Mar 2024 #35
Fani should charge both of them with perjury and prosecute to the fullest extent of the law MichMan Mar 2024 #53
I would guess she wants to move on, with her eyes on the prize spooky3 Mar 2024 #57
Mess could have been avoided if one of them stepped down when this frist broke. Silent Type Mar 2024 #25
I agree orangecrush Mar 2024 #42
Or, as a former Boss of mine used to say... SKKY Mar 2024 #83
If she's smart she'll allow another Joinfortmill Mar 2024 #29
That is what DAs do DarthDem Mar 2024 #38
This doesn't seem like a good look for the prosecutor TexasDem69 Mar 2024 #34
There is no way Willis is going to withdraw MichMan Mar 2024 #54
Are you watching, Clarence? Even the APPEARANCE of impropriety is a longstanding legal ethics standard. JudyM Mar 2024 #39
'said either Willis and her office must fully leave the case or Wade must withdraw from the proceeding.' elleng Mar 2024 #45
Does this fall under the legal term of, "splitting the baby?" Bayard Mar 2024 #49
Seems that way. honest.abe Mar 2024 #64
I don't like this. Socal31 Mar 2024 #78
The judge went way beyond what he should have. Hikerchick57 Mar 2024 #82
This is a great loss of knowledge and expertise that will create delays or worse. live love laugh Mar 2024 #84
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fani Willis can remain on...»Reply #21